To use a corny and annoying phrase: "pick your poison"
I don't think he's all that great but at least Trump isn't part of the so called political elite/establishment or deep state as evidenced by the fact that the establishment hate Trump. So, I'd pick Trump over Clinton any day, just because of the fact that he might shake things up and put an end to the continuity of the political elite. I also don't think he would necessarily be as hard (in office) as he presents himself in the presidential race.
He revealed he has a family, so I'm sure they are in danger. It is not Hillary folks - it is the intelligence community. Right now there is a war between the good guys and the rogues; rogues are winning.
He revealed he has a family, so I'm sure they are in danger. It is not Hillary folks - it is the intelligence community. Right now there is a war between the good guys and the rogues; rogues are winning.
You could be right that it is not Hillary directly involved, but it is the people who back Hillary, such as the banks and the intelligence community, she is their puppet so they will clear the path for her, whether she likes it or not
To use a corny and annoying phrase: "pick your poison"
I don't think he's all that great but at least Trump isn't part of the so called political elite/establishment or deep state as evidenced by the fact that the establishment hate Trump. So, I'd pick Trump over Clinton any day, just because of the fact that he might shake things up and put an end to the continuity of the political elite. I also don't think he would necessarily be as hard (in office) as he presents himself in the presidential race.
'Mr Jones and Amal, colleagues at renowned civil rights legal firm Doughty
Street in central London, were currently trying to save the lives of Colonel
Gaddafi?s son Saif and Libyan spy chief Abdullah al-Senussi.'
'Mr Jones and Amal, colleagues at renowned civil rights legal firm Doughty
Street in central London, were currently trying to save the lives of Colonel
Gaddafi?s son Saif and Libyan spy chief Abdullah al-Senussi.'
Being a big businessman he had to play the game, lobbying for political favors, now he's going in for a coup
so silver spoon daddies boy, after 70 years of fucking people over, changes his ways and wants to fight the very establishment that allowed him to "chapter 11" his way out of trouble?...a dude with 100-s of small businesses suing him for ripping them off, suddenly cares about the little guy?...a dude who would throw entire nations under the bus (mexicans , muslims etc) for political points suddenly cares about normal people?...
so silver spoon daddies boy, after 70 years of fucking people over, changes his ways and wants to fight the very establishment that allowed him to "chapter 11" his way out of trouble?...a dude with 100-s of small businesses suing him for ripping them off, suddenly cares about the little guy?...a dude who would throw entire nations under the bus (mexicans , muslims etc) for political points suddenly cares about normal people?...
sounds fishy to me
He's far from perfect, but he doesn't appear to be a puppet on strings like the rest of them e.g. he speaks out against Big Pharma/vaccines, wants to be friends with Russia, things that others would not dare to do. The mainstream media are attacking him everyday, seems like this guy isn't meant to be there. Doubt he'd ever be allowed into power though, one assumes the bankers will assassinate him if necessary
so silver spoon daddies boy, after 70 years of fucking people over, changes his ways and wants to fight the very establishment that allowed him to "chapter 11" his way out of trouble?...a dude with 100-s of small businesses suing him for ripping them off, suddenly cares about the little guy?...a dude who would throw entire nations under the bus (mexicans , muslims etc) for political points suddenly cares about normal people?...
He's far from perfect, but he doesn't appear to be a puppet on strings like the rest of them e.g. he speaks out against Big Pharma/vaccines, wants to be friends with Russia, things that others would not dare to do. The mainstream media are attacking him everyday, seems like this guy isn't meant to be there. Doubt he'd ever be allowed into power though, one assumes the bankers will assassinate him if necessary
a "billionaire patriot politician" who "loves america" and wants to MAGA has so far spent under 2million$ on his campaign...a billion is 1000 million...he says hes worth 10.000 million...yet his spending on the political future of the country is less than 0.2% of his self proclaimed net worth?...
He kind of does deserve to die. I saw him on Bill Maher a couple of weeks ago, and it's obvious the guy is full of shit. He should be tracked down and killed just for having that haircut and silly logo. WTF is that?
he's an evasive asshole with a holier than thou attitude.
Other than the fact that he gave every government the key
Seems like your bog standard whistleblower to me, not particularly holy or even particularly stuck up. Obviously he's evasive, because he evading capture and with good reason.
Having a irritating personality that people dislike should not be a reason for extra judicial execution. If that was the case, Piers Morgan would have been killed 20 years ago.
Anyway, I have to take this with a pinch of salt as it comes from jingoist ROCHARD [Government Pet]
"In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George Orwell
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
Oh wow, so a man that 75% of governments want dead did something bad? How odd! He seems to have done something that might create the potential for risk among certain populations. Saudi Government and anti-gay people will do the bad act, but he may have given them some information.
Among all the actors, he has done the least. The people that behead gay men? The Saudi government? They're the bad guys. Not information, not truth, and not Assange.
Yeah Assange is a real hero - holed up like a coward too scared to face his accusers in that hotbed of facism Sweden.
The only one abusing his power here is Assange.
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
Oh wow, so a man that 75% of governments want dead did something bad? How odd! He seems to have done something that might create the potential for risk among certain populations. Saudi Government and anti-gay people will do the bad act, but he may have given them some information.
Among all the actors, he has done the least. The people that behead gay men? The Saudi government? They're the bad guys. Not information, not truth, and not Assange.
Oh, for fuck's sake. Handing a person their death sentence does not make it okay because they weren't the ones to chop the head off.
Your argument is ridiculous. In addition to outing the Saudi gay men, they have published the names of teenage rape victims, medical records, financial data, and information relating to paternity disputes, custody fights, and other family concerns. Where is a person's right to privacy in your world? The argument against governments, and for hackers spying into people's private emails and information so they can release it to the world is pretty fucked IMHO. Sounds like you'd love the Orwellian world of 1984.
Oh, and let's also point out that the hackers are probably rich western white heterosexual men of privilege, just like the millionaire Assange. No big shit to them if some gay people die, or how many families they destroy in their quest for power and money.
Oh, for fuck's sake. Handing a person their death sentence does not make it okay because they weren't the ones to chop the head off.
Your argument is ridiculous. In addition to outing the Saudi gay men, they have published the names of teenage rape victims, medical records, financial data, and information relating to paternity disputes, custody fights, and other family concerns. Where is a person's right to privacy in your world? The argument against governments, and for hackers spying into people's private emails and information so they can release it to the world is pretty fucked IMHO. Sounds like you'd love the Orwellian world of 1984.
Oh, and let's also point out that the hackers are probably rich western white heterosexual men of privilege, just like the millionaire Assange. No big shit to them if some gay people die, or how many families they destroy in their quest for power and money.
Releasing info about the governments abuse of power and their corruption, is a good thing. We have a right to know whats going, and we have a right to privacy. It seems like the governments are trying to make the world like 1984. The hackers shouldn't spy on regular citizens or steal, and especially they shouldn't put regular people's lives in danger. But if they are finding info, about our government and its leaders, that sheds light on what's really going on then it's doing good.
Releasing info about the governments abuse of power and their corruption, is a good thing. We have a right to know whats going, and we have a right to privacy. It seems like the governments are trying to make the world like 1984. The hackers shouldn't spy on regular citizens or steal, and especially they shouldn't put regular people's lives in danger. But if they are finding info, about our government and its leaders, that sheds light on what's really going on then it's doing good.
Notice in my post, I attacked him for releasing emails of *private citizens,* not the government or governments. Assange may have started out with some good intentions going after governments and their leaders, and if that's all he targeted I agree it would be a good thing. Unfortunately, he ended up becoming a totally egocentric ass-wipe in his quest for attention, money and power. By breaking into and releasing emails and personal data of private citizens, he's just as bad if not worse than the governments he's supposed to be exposing.
Oh, for fuck's sake. Handing a person their death sentence does not make it okay because they weren't the ones to chop the head off.
Your argument is ridiculous. In addition to outing the Saudi gay men, they have published the names of teenage rape victims, medical records, financial data, and information relating to paternity disputes, custody fights, and other family concerns. Where is a person's right to privacy in your world? The argument against governments, and for hackers spying into people's private emails and information so they can release it to the world is pretty fucked IMHO. Sounds like you'd love the Orwellian world of 1984.
Oh, and let's also point out that the hackers are probably rich western white heterosexual men of privilege, just like the millionaire Assange. No big shit to them if some gay people die, or how many families they destroy in their quest for power and money.
WOW! You're going to fall back on "white privilege" as an argument? If you were on the ground, like that poor woman in the video, screaming and crying for your life, you wouldn't be worried about a hacker, you'd be worried about the guy with the machete about to cut your head off.
Information is NOT the same as killing, my friend, killing is killing. The person who makes the choice to carry out a crime based on information is still a criminal.
In the US, in court, if an accused murderer says, "X told me Y was gay so I killed Y", the murderer would and should still be fried, and X is not culpable at all. But you want a different standard of justice for Saudi Arabia so that they can continue to kill gay people, Jews, people who aren't Muslim, or people who break their stupid religious rules?
Don't blame the whites, buddy, blame people like you who encourage killing of gays and dissenters by giving Saudi Arabia a pass.
When Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, announced he was gay, was he executed? No. The information that he was gay was not harmful in itself at all.
Your argument is a strange, pointless, liberal mish-mash that even I, a democrat who defends Clinton, am ashamed of. To top it off, you probably are white, yet when your argument fails because it has no logic you reach for "white privilege"? Very sad.
Truth is never bad. Transparency in government is never bad. Assange is one man who has done more than you or I ever will to get truth to the people. How would you advocate he carefully edit gigabytes of information while being hunted around the world with false accusations? And he's arrogant, I hear? So was Einstein. And information Einstein gave to Fermi and the world led to the development of the nuclear bomb! You really should think things through.
Comment