Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

I'm not convinced that there is anything good in this ruling at all.

It seems to me that the porn industry always gets shafted. So, why will this be any different?

How's this sound for "probable cause":

"Judge, look at this picture and tell me you don't think there's a chance that this girl is under 18 years old. She looks pretty young to me. Says she's 18, but don't you think there's a chance she's just 17 and 11 months? Why don't you give us a warrant so we can make sure."

I'm betting that holds up every day of the week. What judge wants to take the risk that they didn't allow a prosecutor to investigate a CP case? And what judge is going to throw that out for "not probable cause?"

I don't think this ruling will afford any protection whatsoever.