Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz
How is this good news?
They could have thrown 2257 out completely...now THAT would have been good news.
So now they need a warrant to do an inspection...guess what...all a judge has to do is sign a piece of paper and there you go. Not like they will have any problem finding a judge who is anti-porn and would rather "error" on the side of caution to "protect the children".
This is NOT good news at all.  |
Not really true yes a judge could sign a warrant but as I said if the warrant was obtained without probable cause thats a solid line of defense.
All in all this is the best outcome we could have hoped for...only the most optimistic and unrealistic people would have expected a total strike down of the law but the warrant requirement does put some fairness in it. At least they have to show cause that a particular girl in a particular video is under 18...remember warrants are very specific about what is being searched for...too broad and the warrant is kicked as a fishing expedition...its highly unlikely they can get a warrant to check every file on every girl on every video.