View Single Post
Old 05-14-2015, 05:50 PM  
mikesouth
Confirmed User
 
mikesouth's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: My High Horse
Posts: 6,334
I posted on this earlier today

In essence the law was upheld but the big fly in the ointment is that the records inspections will require a warrant, and as was noted here a warrant requires probable cause and as was not noted also provides an additional line of defense in that an improperly obtained warrant is grounds for exclusion of evidence obtained in the search
I have always said that 2257 was very worng in that it forces me to prove that I didn't commit a crime that never happened in the first place. In other words I am committing a crime by not being able to prove I didn't commit a crime that only happened when i couldn't prove I didn't commit it.

This decision fixes that and at least in my opinion is a correct decision.

The records inspection team was disbanded in 2008 (IIRC) but would likely be re-introduced in a republican presidency, so the timing is also good.
__________________
Mike South

It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
mikesouth is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote