.sex?
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
As long as .com remains legal for adult sites who cares? Most of us have .com's and that should be good enough. Unless adult sites are forced into a specific extension I'd probably just keep all of my .com's, and continue as usual. I don't think .sex or .xxx versions would be necessary unless they are legally mandated. I thought .biz and .tv were going to compete with .com when they were first introduced, but .com maintained it's supremacy.Comment
-
-
I worry that the religious right will pressure gov't to mandate the move of any/all sexual matter sites to .xxx (Stuart Lawley?) or .sex; then, after more political pressure, the gov't will consider mandating the shutdown of all .xxx/.sex traffic.
IMO, maybe we present .com sites should all chip in and apply to obtain the .kids domain TLD/Registry -- and, then launch a nationwide push for all responsible parents to use filters so that their kids can access only .kids domains (and some .com sites that the parents approve for their kids to access!)? We need to show the gov't that it need not censor adult .com access when all that would be needed is for parents to parent (what Internet access their kids have). At the same time, running the .kids might become a profitable business for the ICANN approved .kids registry????????Comment
-
Total stupid idea. Sure some of the exentions sound cool but why would everyone want to throw away the branding of .com that we have been selling the consumer for the past 15 years?you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..Comment

Comment