Quote:
Originally posted by FATPad
Yes it does, fucknut.
If some adult types in gangbangedslutstaking15cumshotsintheireyes.com they should be able to see porn at some point. Big aroused cocks slamming into some little wet pussy then blowing their load all over her face.
If however, some kid types in sexeducation.com and is presented with stolen hardcore pics and some douchebag who wants to molest children calling himself "dad" then there's a problem.
|
YES ... I agree with that domain.
WhiteHouse.com - no.
Sex.com ... I don't know.
SexEducation.com - man did I pick a difficult domain to satisfy everyone.
"Dad@" is gone now - I told you that.
"Dad@" is being replaced with "JB@".
But that does not answer the question that started all of this ...
Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on ANY directly accessed domain name ... and I agree with my members email - it should not - and consumers expect to click on an over 18+ button.