Photographer Roger Kisby?s honest images will change how you see porn actors

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • xXXtesy10
    Fakecoin Investor
    • Jul 2012
    • 7127
    #31
    Originally posted by yuu
    why they receive such horrible tattoos. this look like scene in dirty fishtank

    WARNING: Stay Away From Marlboroack aka aka Brandon Ackerman
    http://gfy.com/21169705-post8.html
    Donny Long is Felon, Stalker, Scammer & Coward
    http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...lon-int-761244

      Comment

      • TheDA
        Confirmed User
        • May 2006
        • 4665
        #32
        Not Kisby's best work that's for sure. I really wonder why he bothered, they look so amateurish.
        Sharleen Spiteri - 1989 - In The Ass

          Comment

          • JustDaveXxx
            I AM JUSTDAVE !
            • Feb 2005
            • 4111
            #33
            Its funny that people make disparaging comments about hot porn girls with no make up.




            Call times are usually 8am-9am and the girl comes fresh out of the shower to set.


            Why would any girl put on make up at home before going to set to get make up put on?


            News flash! Every girl looks different with make up on versus no make up. Shit!! Guys look different with make up on.


            Check out.






            Just Dave


            Smut Peddler Productions.com
            ICQ #378-696-435 / / Skype: JustDaveXxx
            "We shoot custom, exclusive content your way"

              Comment

              • JayAllan
                So Fucking Banned
                • Jan 2008
                • 1148
                #34
                Originally posted by Robbie
                The pics Kisby did are okay...but not even in the same league as what I was thinking of when I read "honest images" in the title. The pics he took look like nice pics taken by a mall photographer. Not bad. Just nothing special.
                Couldn't agree with you more. Bad concept with poor execution. Van Style's shoots a very cool "porn star on the street" style that is visually striking. These are just lame portraits with bad lighting. No point to them really. Also to all those commenting about the girls makeup and lack of it... you are idiots.

                  Comment

                  • Robbie
                    Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 20960
                    #35
                    Originally posted by JayAllan
                    Couldn't agree with you more. Bad concept with poor execution. Van Style's shoots a very cool "porn star on the street" style that is visually striking. These are just lame portraits with bad lighting. No point to them really. Also to all those commenting about the girls makeup and lack of it... you are idiots.
                    Yeah, I don't think an "honest" portrait has anything to do with whether a girl is wearing makeup or not.

                    The concept of looking for the true person captured in a moment of time by a photographer would require that photographer to spend many days (maybe even weeks) taking photos of a subject at all times of the day and night.

                    And then carefully looking at all those photos to find "the one" that really captures their essence.

                    Not an easy thing to do. Which is why there are only a handful of iconic photographers like that in history. The kind of guys who sell numbered prints of their photos.

                    Setting up a camera on a tripod and taking a bunch of head shots of porn stars real quick...that's not going to show them in that manner.

                    I guess the way this was presented as "an honest look" was an unfortunate description to say the least. But it has NOTHING to do with wearing makeup or not.

                    Now here is a chick whose has that "magic touch" to bring out the "soul" of her subjects:
                    https://www.google.com/search?q=phot...h=738&dpr=1.25
                    -Robbie
                    ClaudiaMarie.Com

                      Comment

                      • fitzmulti
                        I Like Depth Of Field!
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 14861
                        #36
                        Originally posted by marcop
                        These portraits are not good... amateur looking, probably because of the amateur lighting. But the photographer gets nothing out of the models--no sense of the person. They're the kind of image you can get from a $100 headshot photographer from Craigslist.
                        Agreed. Bland emotionless, etc.
                        Other than Riley Reid's:


                        www.SexyGirlsCash.com

                        CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM //
                        {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

                          Comment

                          • Tom-LifeSelector
                            Confirmed User
                            • Sep 2013
                            • 767
                            #37
                            These "honest" images will not change how I see porn actors


                            LifeSelector Affiliates - Make money today promoting the online porn of tomorrow.

                            tom [at] lifeselector.com
                            skype: tom-ia
                            icq: 684001976

                              Comment

                              • VikingMan
                                Exploiting human weakness
                                • Jan 2008
                                • 6857
                                #38
                                Those photos suck. If they want to lose a quick 2 pounds they can wash off their make up.

                                  Comment

                                  Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                                  Working...