Water Powered Cars

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dave90210
    Registered User
    • Mar 2007
    • 1745

    #1

    Water Powered Cars

    Anyone tried that water for gas hybrid kit? I guess you add some water to this tube and it creates over 1000 gallons worth of Hydrogen fuel to supplement your cars gas consumption. People claim they get 80 miles to the gallon now.
  • Zuzana Designs
    All Your Design Needs
    • Feb 2005
    • 20903

    #2
    I have heard nothing about this ?? Do you have a link ?

    Website Design - Consulting - Development
    sarah [at] zuzanadesigns.com - See Our Work

    Comment

    • PlugRush Sascha
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 2772

      #3
      Hahaha! 2 million miles per gallon!
      Plugrush - Push ads, native ads, banners & pops. Buy & sell adult and mainstream traffic.

      Skype plugrushsascha

      Comment

      • dave90210
        Registered User
        • Mar 2007
        • 1745

        #4
        http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/

        Some sites sell kits for like $300

        Comment

        • PlugRush Sascha
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2004
          • 2772

          #5
          Originally posted by dave90210
          http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com/

          Some sites sell kits for like $300
          Fuck, that's a great business model. All your costumers are idiots, so you can probably sell them some other stupid shit after the sale.
          Plugrush - Push ads, native ads, banners & pops. Buy & sell adult and mainstream traffic.

          Skype plugrushsascha

          Comment

          • GetSCORECash
            Confirmed User
            • Mar 2008
            • 5527

            #6
            You buy, install it, and then tell us if it works.
            | skype: getscorecash | ICQ: 59-271-063 |
            New Sites: | SCORELAND2 | Roku Channel SCORETV.TV | 60PLUSMILFS |
            | Big Tit Hooker | Tits And Tugs | Big Boobs POV | Karla James |
            | Naughty Foot Jobs | Linsey's World | Busty Arianna Sinn | Get SCORE Cash |

            Comment

            • After Shock Media
              It's coming look busy
              • Mar 2001
              • 35299

              #7
              Its BS, and if you really need a full explanation I will supply. I actually have done much testing as my father is a conspiracy nut and often the only way to show him otherwise is to actually build shit. Plus I just love to make things.

              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

              Comment

              • JasonSmokes
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2007
                • 364

                #8
                do a wiki search it's debunked on there.
                ---
                www.angelbutton.com
                ---

                Comment

                • dave90210
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 1745

                  #9
                  Please explain.

                  Originally posted by After Shock Media
                  Its BS, and if you really need a full explanation I will supply. I actually have done much testing as my father is a conspiracy nut and often the only way to show him otherwise is to actually build shit. Plus I just love to make things.

                  Comment

                  • potter
                    Confirmed User
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 6559

                    #10
                    this thread brings the funny

                    Comment

                    • tony299
                      lurker
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 57021

                      #11
                      you are going to see lots of bullshit like this coming out.At my condo meeting this lady showed us a brochure about this thing you put on your fuse box and it lowers the amps but everything works fine and lasts longer. I googled it and learned it was a piece of garbage.
                      Last edited by tony286; 06-16-2008, 07:56 PM.

                      Comment

                      • dave90210
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 1745

                        #12
                        I think it works the guy who invented the technology was murdered. If it didn't work then why would the oil company see the need to kill this guy?

                        Comment

                        • Socks
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2002
                          • 8475

                          #13

                          Comment

                          • PlugRush Sascha
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2004
                            • 2772

                            #14
                            Originally posted by dave90210
                            I think it works the guy who invented the technology was murdered. If it didn't work then why would the oil company see the need to kill this guy?
                            Hahaha, for $300 it better work, right? What happens when hydrogen touches air? Exactly.
                            Plugrush - Push ads, native ads, banners & pops. Buy & sell adult and mainstream traffic.

                            Skype plugrushsascha

                            Comment

                            • Zuzana Designs
                              All Your Design Needs
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 20903

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Socks
                              Blahhh thats funny

                              Website Design - Consulting - Development
                              sarah [at] zuzanadesigns.com - See Our Work

                              Comment

                              • datawookiee
                                Confirmed User
                                • Apr 2006
                                • 146

                                #16
                                If it seems to good (which it does) then it probably is. A great hoax, but none the less a hoax. The whole process of extracting hydrogen from water requires a lot more effort then just some plastic tubes and a thingey on your carb.

                                And if it really were real, why dont the car industry already use it. If the oil companies supressed it, how come they havent just thrown a few million at this guy to shut him up? It doesnt make sense so it isnt real.

                                However you can get hydrogen cars where the hydrogen fuel the chemical reaction in a battery powering an electric engine that in turn runs the car. Far more plausible idea, and they actually work.

                                Comment

                                • After Shock Media
                                  It's coming look busy
                                  • Mar 2001
                                  • 35299

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by dave90210
                                  Please explain.
                                  Ok even with very good step up transformers you are in need of a large amount of electricity to really produce a significant amount of hydrogen. You are almost dealing with a loss of energy at this point, you are putting in almost more than you will get out. Yes you can do it with even a 9 volt battery but it will produce next to none.

                                  Next issue is many use aluminum rods, actually plates work much better but they must be layered and separated by very thin plastic washers, though Pyrex, glass, or heat resistant polymers would be best as plastic can start to degrade after running it for a bit.

                                  Now many including the "murdered" inventor said he used a certain frequency to pulse the electricity. This is a sticking point and nobody seems to know the exact frequency and well the dude is dead and his patents do not say the frequency. Though pulsing the electricity is indeed the best route over a steady stream. Though keep in mind original guy also used rods instead of plates which is less surface area and thus less production.

                                  You will have a heating problem to deal with and overcome. Yes the liquid heats and gets hotter and hotter. If you really apply a cooling method you again loose a little more production power in your creation.

                                  Also few will admit but if you try hydrogen creation in regular tap water after a very short period of time scum will appear on the surface and in your water. This is due to the impurities of the water. Your only safe bet and sure fire way to not have to deal with this is by using distilled water only. Yet another cost.

                                  Now a good process will indeed produce hydrogen and usable energy that can be burned from its production. You are lucky to be pulling even a watt or two's worth in a short period of time. Of course you could allow it to build up first (heat issues again, plus storage issues) and then you effectively have a supply of energy that can be converted again. One of the reasons NASA uses it is it is more cost efficient to send it to space and that most of the equipment used operates on super tiny amounts of electricity. Though they would generate more power if they could pull a streamer behind themselves in the shuttle in space (different topic).

                                  Nobody is really trying to hide this technology. Hell people are actively looking at hydrogen cars and the real stopping issue is the infrastructure. Yet adding a small little tank to your car is not going to do shit but make someone a few hundred dollars.

                                  Efficient hydrogen production is a reality. It just uses a few methods to help curtail the other side issues. Obviously if you can generate the electricity via hydroelectric then you are ahead of the game as that is also clean and at same time is renewable. Using the sun and the huge as reflectors they now have (check Spain, Australia) also produce a great deal of power that could in turn be pushed through water and stored as hydrogen. Though for the most part unless you have a windmill, a solar farm, a waterwheel, or some other renewable energy that is free or nearly free you just end up using power from grid and most of that comes from coal.

                                  Right now though is a time right for scammers. People may easily get suckered into some device that is a water battery yet it just costs like 15 bucks per kilowatt hour or some shit assuming it can even produce that much on a steady bases.

                                  Questions and sorry it is a little all over the place. My night was horrid and today is recovery day.

                                  [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                  Comment

                                  • jollyperv
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2001
                                    • 3927

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                    Ok even with very good step up transformers you are in need of a large amount of electricity to really produce a significant amount of hydrogen. You are almost dealing with a loss of energy at this point, you are putting in almost more than you will get out. Yes you can do it with even a 9 volt battery but it will produce next to none.

                                    Next issue is many use aluminum rods, actually plates work much better but they must be layered and separated by very thin plastic washers, though Pyrex, glass, or heat resistant polymers would be best as plastic can start to degrade after running it for a bit.

                                    Now many including the "murdered" inventor said he used a certain frequency to pulse the electricity. This is a sticking point and nobody seems to know the exact frequency and well the dude is dead and his patents do not say the frequency. Though pulsing the electricity is indeed the best route over a steady stream. Though keep in mind original guy also used rods instead of plates which is less surface area and thus less production.

                                    You will have a heating problem to deal with and overcome. Yes the liquid heats and gets hotter and hotter. If you really apply a cooling method you again loose a little more production power in your creation.

                                    Also few will admit but if you try hydrogen creation in regular tap water after a very short period of time scum will appear on the surface and in your water. This is due to the impurities of the water. Your only safe bet and sure fire way to not have to deal with this is by using distilled water only. Yet another cost.

                                    Now a good process will indeed produce hydrogen and usable energy that can be burned from its production. You are lucky to be pulling even a watt or two's worth in a short period of time. Of course you could allow it to build up first (heat issues again, plus storage issues) and then you effectively have a supply of energy that can be converted again. One of the reasons NASA uses it is it is more cost efficient to send it to space and that most of the equipment used operates on super tiny amounts of electricity. Though they would generate more power if they could pull a streamer behind themselves in the shuttle in space (different topic).

                                    Nobody is really trying to hide this technology. Hell people are actively looking at hydrogen cars and the real stopping issue is the infrastructure. Yet adding a small little tank to your car is not going to do shit but make someone a few hundred dollars.

                                    Efficient hydrogen production is a reality. It just uses a few methods to help curtail the other side issues. Obviously if you can generate the electricity via hydroelectric then you are ahead of the game as that is also clean and at same time is renewable. Using the sun and the huge as reflectors they now have (check Spain, Australia) also produce a great deal of power that could in turn be pushed through water and stored as hydrogen. Though for the most part unless you have a windmill, a solar farm, a waterwheel, or some other renewable energy that is free or nearly free you just end up using power from grid and most of that comes from coal.

                                    Right now though is a time right for scammers. People may easily get suckered into some device that is a water battery yet it just costs like 15 bucks per kilowatt hour or some shit assuming it can even produce that much on a steady bases.

                                    Questions and sorry it is a little all over the place. My night was horrid and today is recovery day.
                                    Excellent post. Speaking of free, renewable energy...I recently read an article about how newer solar cells are getting up to 50% efficiency, up from only about 6-10% that the shitty first generation ones get...and just like every other modern scientific breakthrough, the newer cells use, you guessed it, nanotech.

                                    Comment

                                    • After Shock Media
                                      It's coming look busy
                                      • Mar 2001
                                      • 35299

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by jollyperv
                                      Excellent post. Speaking of free, renewable energy...I recently read an article about how newer solar cells are getting up to 50% efficiency, up from only about 6-10% that the shitty first generation ones get...and just like every other modern scientific breakthrough, the newer cells use, you guessed it, nanotech.
                                      Look at the next gen ones that are being made by printing them.

                                      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                      Comment

                                      • pornask
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • Aug 2006
                                        • 6518

                                        #20
                                        Genepax Invents a Car that Runs on Water

                                        Honda FCX Clarity - First Commercial Hydrogen Car

                                        Comment

                                        • dave90210
                                          Registered User
                                          • Mar 2007
                                          • 1745

                                          #21
                                          That's awesome!


                                          Comment

                                          • bhutocracy
                                            Not making A Comeback
                                            • Dec 2001
                                            • 10218

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                            Ok even with very good step up transformers you are in need of a large amount of electricity to really produce a significant amount of hydrogen. You are almost dealing with a loss of energy at this point, you are putting in almost more than you will get out. Yes you can do it with even a 9 volt battery but it will produce next to none.

                                            Next issue is many use aluminum rods, actually plates work much better but they must be layered and separated by very thin plastic washers, though Pyrex, glass, or heat resistant polymers would be best as plastic can start to degrade after running it for a bit.

                                            Now many including the "murdered" inventor said he used a certain frequency to pulse the electricity. This is a sticking point and nobody seems to know the exact frequency and well the dude is dead and his patents do not say the frequency. Though pulsing the electricity is indeed the best route over a steady stream. Though keep in mind original guy also used rods instead of plates which is less surface area and thus less production.

                                            You will have a heating problem to deal with and overcome. Yes the liquid heats and gets hotter and hotter. If you really apply a cooling method you again loose a little more production power in your creation.

                                            Also few will admit but if you try hydrogen creation in regular tap water after a very short period of time scum will appear on the surface and in your water. This is due to the impurities of the water. Your only safe bet and sure fire way to not have to deal with this is by using distilled water only. Yet another cost.

                                            Now a good process will indeed produce hydrogen and usable energy that can be burned from its production. You are lucky to be pulling even a watt or two's worth in a short period of time. Of course you could allow it to build up first (heat issues again, plus storage issues) and then you effectively have a supply of energy that can be converted again. One of the reasons NASA uses it is it is more cost efficient to send it to space and that most of the equipment used operates on super tiny amounts of electricity. Though they would generate more power if they could pull a streamer behind themselves in the shuttle in space (different topic).

                                            Nobody is really trying to hide this technology. Hell people are actively looking at hydrogen cars and the real stopping issue is the infrastructure. Yet adding a small little tank to your car is not going to do shit but make someone a few hundred dollars.

                                            Efficient hydrogen production is a reality. It just uses a few methods to help curtail the other side issues. Obviously if you can generate the electricity via hydroelectric then you are ahead of the game as that is also clean and at same time is renewable. Using the sun and the huge as reflectors they now have (check Spain, Australia) also produce a great deal of power that could in turn be pushed through water and stored as hydrogen. Though for the most part unless you have a windmill, a solar farm, a waterwheel, or some other renewable energy that is free or nearly free you just end up using power from grid and most of that comes from coal.

                                            Right now though is a time right for scammers. People may easily get suckered into some device that is a water battery yet it just costs like 15 bucks per kilowatt hour or some shit assuming it can even produce that much on a steady bases.

                                            Questions and sorry it is a little all over the place. My night was horrid and today is recovery day.
                                            You have been impressing lately.

                                            The only thing is that Stanley Meyer was proven to be a fraud by a court in Ohio. He wasn't killed by oil companies because a) that happened years later, well after the horse had bolted and would ahve served absolutely no purpose... b) it didn't work because it violates the laws of physics.. c) even on the .00001% chance someone did kill him it would have been the people he defrauded.. and d) H didn't even invent it, a new fraudster pops up every decade to claim the exact same technology (with maybe one or two insignificant twists) Yull Brown was probably his immediate predecessor.

                                            Comment

                                            • bhutocracy
                                              Not making A Comeback
                                              • Dec 2001
                                              • 10218

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                              Look at the next gen ones that are being made by printing them.

                                              Not only that but are being combined with the actual product itself, ie the steel in steel roofing or the glass in a window. It's not just the overall efficiency growth.. it's the variable environment they can produce electricity in - actually producing electricity by moonlight because they use artificial photosynthesis.

                                              Comment

                                              • rvincent
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Feb 2005
                                                • 431

                                                #24
                                                I predict spams selling these scammy devices will soon be more numerous than Penis-Extending devices.
                                                Victoria Holyns : promote her siteHERE !

                                                Comment

                                                • tranza
                                                  ICQ: 197-556-237
                                                  • Jun 2003
                                                  • 57559

                                                  #25
                                                  Hahaha...LOL
                                                  I'm just a newbie.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • sniperwolf
                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                    • Mar 2005
                                                    • 17743

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by rvincent
                                                    I predict spams selling these scammy devices will soon be more numerous than Penis-Extending devices.
                                                    So true! scammers had their own way on how to gain amidst the cirisis.
                                                    ~Accepting design works~

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...