Quote:
Originally posted by LadyMischief
Instead of spending your money getting new domains, why not fucking save your pennies and hire yourself a lawyer. In fact, most lawyers will give you a free telephone consultation.. Instead of acting like you know something, do the right thing and call a lawyer.
|
There has never been - in all the many years - that SexEducation.com began evolving a "formal complaint".
And even - with this current temporary shut-down - I was not presented with any evidence or formal correspondence for the reason of the shut-down from the people involved in this shut-down.
What others need to realize ... and that you clearly do ... from other boards is that this started when I posted ...
"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN."
And from that single post - a "witch hunt" began ...
and quite honestly ... lessons were learned.
The decision to post this statement has been beneficial and SexEducation.com is in the process of changing.
But the readers of this post should know ...
There has not been a healthy focussed discussion of this statement regardless of where I go - what ever board - I have posted this on.
What has happened is personal attacks against me and my website or I just get banned.
"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN."
The discussion of this statement - which I believe - is necessary for the evolution of the internet and the reasonable rights of the majority of the world (children) to the information age - remains undebated among the adult industry which often does the opposite.
I'm taking the traffic of this discussion to another board.
Where hopefully - the rules are enforced - and a debate of the topic can take place and so that I may learn from that debate.
Quite truthfully - I was expecting - some type of constitional discussion that "once you force authors to ...." or "it's a slippery slope when Big Brother gets involved with freedom of speech ..."
What seems to be the answer is that Adult Webmasters feel that this will cut into profits ... pocketbooks.
But you know what? I don't think so.
Most consumers are prepared to click on an over "18 button".
They in fact expect to now.
What I did not say - is that there should be no "nudity" of any type.
However, I feel - and still do - that it is unreasonable to show aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on a directly accessed domain - just that one page - and that doing so is not an unreasonable restriction to freedom of the press.
Adult Webmasters will still make money, and be able to show whatever they wish within the law, and it would aid software filtering companies like NetNanny etc.
[PLUG]
Every person that is reproductively capable has a self evident right to an understanding of such.
What and when they learn about certains aspects is a Parents decision.