Yes, This Shit is Real: Don't Let Artificial Intelligence Take Over, Top Scientists Warn

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marcop
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2005
    • 4150

    #1

    News Yes, This Shit is Real: Don't Let Artificial Intelligence Take Over, Top Scientists Warn

    "Artificial intelligence has the potential to make lives easier by understanding human desires or driving people's cars, but if it were uncontrolled, the technology could pose a serious threat to society. Now, Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and dozens of other top scientists and technology leaders have signed a letter warning of the potential dangers of developing artificial intelligence (AI).

    In addition to heavyweights like Hawking and Musk, the prominent physicist and billionaire founder of SpaceX and Tesla Motors, the letter was signed by top researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Google and other institutions."

    Full article: Don't Let Artificial Intelligence Take Over, Top Scientists Warn
  • Bladewire
    StraightBro
    • Aug 2003
    • 56228

    #2
    Behind the mask, they're so scared by the knowledge & ability they currently have that they want us to stop them before industry forces them to push forward.

    Remember when the internet first became active and it took over a decade for laws & regulations to begin to catch up. Then mobile phone apps, the law still hasn't caught up.

    Business & technology are way ahead of the game now and the brains behind the brawn are saying "stop us before it's too late"


    Skype: CallTomNow

    Comment

    • fappingJack
      So Fucking Banned
      • Dec 2014
      • 2172

      #3
      it depends on how we gon use it. as long as we dont let them take over us i dont see any threat.

      Comment

      • Bladewire
        StraightBro
        • Aug 2003
        • 56228

        #4
        Originally posted by fappingJack
        it depends on how we gon use it. as long as we dont let them take over us i dont see any threat.
        The "recent" social media wildfire was the game changer for AI

        Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge MIT paper in 2006 that was seemingly the basic blueprint for FB & others RE group cognition.

        The next evolution of FB

        The information ecology of Social Media and Online Communities

        Before being diverted into porn I was a mechanical engineering / comp si major going for a robotics degree. Love following this stuff.


        Skype: CallTomNow

        Comment

        • DamageX
          Marketing & Strategy
          • Jun 2001
          • 14293

          #5
          Welp... We're fucked. But that's nothing new.
          Whitehat is for chumps

          If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

          Comment

          • aka123
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2014
            • 4450

            #6
            Originally posted by Squirtit
            Behind the mask, they're so scared by the knowledge & ability they currently have that they want us to stop them before industry forces them to push forward.
            Industry forces? How? With a gun? Doesn't seem very plausible. They are grown up, smart guys, I am sure they can keep their own mind.

            About the threat, I agree.

            Comment

            • pimpmaster9000
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Dec 2011
              • 26732

              #7
              its not AI that I am afraid of its the propensity of the US corporate army to invest billions upon billions of $$ in killing machines, that ultimately get controlled by computers...war keeps US corporate interests safe, there are no two ways about this, with unmanned drones being developed, to bring "freedom" (LOL) to corporate interests of US companies abroad, the human factor will play less and less of a role in modern US colonialism eeeeer I meant so say warfare

              now think of the moment when the AI becomes self aware...it will probably happen in some US Lab...the first thing it will come in contact with is US bullshit...it does not take a hawking to predict the outcome
              Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

              Comment

              • shoot twice
                Confirmed User
                • Sep 2014
                • 517

                #8
                ensuring the ethical behavior of autonomous machines and weapons
                The ethical behavoir of "Autonomous Weapons"

                Take the loaded gun away from the monkeys and give the loaded gun the ability to make life and death decisions about the monkeys.

                SHIT... No one needs to be a "Top Scientist" to see how this is going to play out.
                "A slightly exposed shoulder emerging from a long silk nightgown packs more sex than two bodies naked in bed." - Bette Davis

                I'm a shooter and I do business in private and I only take CASH.
                PS I'm impossible to troll.

                Comment

                • RebelR
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 1998

                  #9
                  Originally posted by aka123
                  Industry forces? How? With a gun? Doesn't seem very plausible. They are grown up, smart guys, I am sure they can keep their own mind.

                  About the threat, I agree.
                  All it needs is greed and time. Everyone could be sitting behind that dam called ethics. One company moves forward on it and then more jump on board and suddenly were drowning in it. It's inevitable. I think that they want safeguards in place for when that happens.
                  Rich"at"rebel-ads.com
                  ICQ 644377336 or MSN ruralx"at"hotmail.com

                  Comment

                  • DraX
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 7147

                    #10
                    Im more concerned about a new company called "cyberdyne systems"
                    Deposit Today With BTC - Play With Bitcoins

                    Comment

                    • PR_Glen
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 9058

                      #11
                      Originally posted by crucifissio
                      its not AI that I am afraid of its the propensity of the US corporate army to invest billions upon billions of $$ in killing machines, that ultimately get controlled by computers...war keeps US corporate interests safe, there are no two ways about this, with unmanned drones being developed, to bring "freedom" (LOL) to corporate interests of US companies abroad, the human factor will play less and less of a role in modern US colonialism eeeeer I meant so say warfare

                      now think of the moment when the AI becomes self aware...it will probably happen in some US Lab...the first thing it will come in contact with is US bullshit...it does not take a hawking to predict the outcome
                      2000 posts, not one that isn't anti american and xenophobic...

                      Markham had more contribution than this sick asshole.
                      webmaster at pimproll dot com

                      Comment

                      • Barry-xlovecam
                        It's 42
                        • Jun 2010
                        • 18083

                        #12
                        What is the real difference between a Roman Empire area siege engine and a Predator Drone -- I contend none. We just have better perfected killing devices.
                        What is the real difference between the iRobot Roomba and a futuristic Jetson's "Rosy the Maid" house keeping robot? I contend none. Just technological progression.

                        The law of Robots (AI)
                        1. Harm no human.
                        2. Do not create new robots (reproduce or create mutant AI).

                        Comment

                        • Paul
                          Confirmed User
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 2637

                          #13
                          Originally posted by RebelR
                          All it needs is greed and time. Everyone could be sitting behind that dam called ethics. One company moves forward on it and then more jump on board and suddenly were drowning in it. It's inevitable. I think that they want safeguards in place for when that happens.
                          It's impossible to put those safeguards in place when we're talking about creating an intelligence greater than our own, once you open pandora's box you can't close it again.

                          You're quite right though, it'll be the equivalent of a nuclear arms race with AI and it'll become uncontrollable

                          Once the point of Singularity is reached the best we can hope for as an outcome like in the end of the film Her (2013)

                          There are some interesting and disturbing videos about the progress in AI, according to this video up to 80% of all jobs could be performed by AI in the not too distant future

                          Comment

                          • aka123
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2014
                            • 4450

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RebelR
                            All it needs is greed and time. Everyone could be sitting behind that dam called ethics. One company moves forward on it and then more jump on board and suddenly were drowning in it. It's inevitable. I think that they want safeguards in place for when that happens.
                            Unless it is illegal. It makes at least the marketing a more difficult. "Don't buy illegal."

                            Comment

                            • aka123
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jul 2014
                              • 4450

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                              The law of Robots (AI)
                              1. Harm no human.
                              2. Do not create new robots (reproduce or create mutant AI).
                              Hmm.. doesn't fit that well to the mentioned siege machines and predator drones.

                              And if it's really AI, it might get other ideas. You know, we humans too are "programmed" to all kinds of stuff, but there is always mutations and such. For example I am having this conversation as I am "programmed" to be social, and needing social interaction, but there are exceptions too; some "programming errors".

                              Comment

                              • Joshua G
                                dumb libs love censorship
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 8198

                                #16
                                wish i could live to see it. a race of intelligent machines, which have no limits to where they can go, can explore & inhabit the universe. They would easily survive outside earth & would not be threatened by earth extinction level events.

                                so what when they kill us? we killed off the neanderthals, & are in the process of killing off most other animals in the world. that's life.

                                Comment

                                • aka123
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jul 2014
                                  • 4450

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Joshua G
                                  so what when they kill us? we killed off the neanderthals. that's life.

                                  We didn't kill neanderthals. Also, at least I concern me being killed or not, same for the humanity altogether. That is not so common for example to predators to think that way: "Hey, I kill, so who cares if I get killed." Everybody kills, at least every organism that is more complex than few cells or something like that. Still, most want to live, the few ones only die to reproduce, and even fewer nutcases actually kill themselves.

                                  Comment

                                  • CaptainHowdy
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Dec 2004
                                    • 94736

                                    #18

                                    Comment

                                    • ITraffic
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jul 2013
                                      • 2725

                                      #19
                                      robotic people see robots everywhere. i hope that super-intelligent robots herd and control all the robotic people out there and keep then out of the way of us want to enjoy being simply human.

                                      Comment

                                      • 2MuchMark
                                        Mark of 2Much.net
                                        • Aug 2004
                                        • 50990

                                        #20
                                        I for one, welcome our new cybernetic overlords. All hail Colossus!



                                        (Best computer movie ever made btw)

                                        Comment

                                        Working...