Quote:
Originally Posted by femdomdestiny
Of course that Russia is helping rebels, just like US is helping rebels against Asad (and Russians helped Asad) or that US helped muslims on Kosovo, and dozen another examples (and they will always deny involvement). Nothing new. There were no war until violent happenings in Kiev.Country was peaceful until that moment. What I am saying is that Russians acted weak. There was no reason to play it small , but play big, which means same what they did in Crimea. That would save lives, Ukrainian military (nazis and mercenaries) would simply run away but infrastructure and lives would be saved. Unfortunately Ukrainian lives are not important to NATO or Russia and ordinary people are paying the price.
Main looser there is Ukraine. They will feel it in incoming months but signs of that are available all over, from currency going down up to armed and masked people running around Kiev. Not to mention dead people, devastated families and ruined economy. Ukraine don't have any chance for normal life from now. Getting in any kind of fight with powerful neighbour will result is total economic disaster. Which means more dead people with lack of heating,medicaments,money.etc...
|
Well, Russia denies it's help to rebels. Why you see Russia's help as a positive thing or Russias intervention as a positive thing? You say you don't want humanitarian disaster, but still you want military actions? Why? There is no fighting without those rebels, or Russia's attack.
About the Kiev, as far as I know the Russian led puppet president had problems going on for years, and peace was far from that.
You talk about nazis, but nazis are gone, and the few neo-nazis are not that big issue. If rebels would stop fighting against Ukrainian government, what do you think would happen? If Ukrainian government would stop fighting, Russia would annex eastern Ukraine, or at least make it as a puppet country.