Hendrix Estate Says Vivid's Hendrix Sex Video Is A Fake

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
    Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
    • Jul 2004
    • 38323

    #1

    Hendrix Estate Says Vivid's Hendrix Sex Video Is A Fake

    We, Experience Hendrix, the family company of Jimi Hendrix are aware of the release of the adult videotape which alleges to contain illicit footage of Jimi Hendrix. We strongly dispute the claimed authenticity and affirmatively state that Experience Hendrix is neither involved in, nor have we authorized the distribution of this film. Further, we deplore this obvious exploitation of Jimi Hendrix. We view the release as nothing more than a callous attempt to trade on the image and reputation of a deceased artist who is unable to defend himself against such an outrageous and baseless assertion. We are highly offended by the disgraceful portrayal.

    While we do not wish to call undue attention to this desecration, we reserve all rights and remedies under the law to protect the character and legacy of Jimi Hendrix with which we have been charged and legally possess.
    I'm happy to know that the Hendrix estate is not involved with the Vivid sex tape.

    Several people who knew Hendrix have also stated that it can't be him, citing specific reasons such as, Hendrix had different facial/body features, and the fact that Hendrix didn't wear as many rings as the person purported to be Hendrix is wearing (I wonder if there are even any photos of Hendrix wearing the same jewlery he is wearing in the video).

    Personally, I don't care whether or not the video shows the real Jimi Hendrix...Vivid really crossed a moral line in releasing the video, and I hope they gets their asses sued for doing so.

    ADG
    Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



    Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)
  • After Shock Media
    It's coming look busy
    • Mar 2001
    • 35299

    #2
    I always heard he was pretty damn shy anyways. To me that typically means you do not film yourself having sex or let someone else film you.

    Now can people get slapped around for using the name?

    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

    Comment

    • Spunky
      I need a beer
      • Jun 2002
      • 133978

      #3
      I wanted to see Jimi bone the white bitches

      Comment

      • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
        Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
        • Jul 2004
        • 38323

        #4
        Originally posted by After Shock Media
        I always heard he was pretty damn shy anyways. To me that typically means you do not film yourself having sex or let someone else film you.

        Now can people get slapped around for using the name?
        It's possible that Hendrix filmed himself having sex, lot's of people do, that doesn't mean that they want the whole world to see it.

        On a technical note, back in the 60's, film had to be developed, and even a person of Hendrix' stature would have had difficulty getting a sex film processed (particularly if it involved multiple partners and interracial sex - remember, what we take for granted, was taboo 40 years ago).

        I don't know the legalities surrounding whether Vivid has a right to use the name Jimi Hendrix, whether or not it is actually Hendrix depicted. I'm fairly certain that Vivid's thinks that they are on solid legal ground.

        It will be interesting to see what the next move will be by the Hendrix Estate.

        ADG
        Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



        Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

        Comment

        • The_Truth_Will_Hurts
          So Fucking Banned
          • Feb 2008
          • 352

          #5
          May Vivid rot in hell

          Comment

          • tony299
            lurker
            • Aug 2002
            • 57021

            #6
            You got to remember its not like now, pull out the video camera and get busy. Back then it was film and everyone didnt develop that type of stuff. So it would of taken lots of planning.
            IMO I doubt its him.

            Comment

            • morningstar
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2007
              • 443

              #7
              I'm a big fun, and I'm so happy to hear that.

              Comment

              • vod
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2006
                • 3510

                #8
                wow... surprise surprise


                Adult Merchant Account

                Comment

                • Some Guy
                  Affordable Content!
                  • Dec 2001
                  • 1750

                  #9
                  Yeah, whether it's real or not, it was pretty low of Vivid. Not cool on their part.

                  Comment

                  • pr0
                    rockin tha trailerpark
                    • May 2001
                    • 23088

                    #10
                    Originally posted by tony404
                    You got to remember its not like now, pull out the video camera and get busy. Back then it was film and everyone didnt develop that type of stuff. So it would of taken lots of planning.
                    IMO I doubt its him.
                    he was rich/famous....& no doubt had friends in hollywood

                    if anyone could have gotten film developed back then it def would have been him
                    __________
                    Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

                    Comment

                    • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                      best designer on GFY
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 30307

                      #11
                      I can prove it is fake.

                      Comment

                      • CyberHustler
                        Masterbaiter
                        • Feb 2006
                        • 28794

                        #12
                        Do you people feel Vivid crossed the line because he passed away?
                        “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

                        Comment

                        • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                          Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 38323

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Cyber-Hu$tler
                          Do you people feel Vivid crossed the line because he passed away?
                          If Jimi Hendrix was alive and cut a deal to share profits with Vivid, then I would have no problem with it - the facts are, he's dead, he didn't give his permission for the video to be commercially released, and his estate doesn't want it released.

                          Despite all this, Vivid is exploiting Jimi Hendrix for the sake of blind greed...

                          ADG
                          Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                          Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                          Comment

                          Working...