The best I can say is that you helped to split the party.
If I split an apple 50% to 50% and hand you half of it, are you proposing that somehow down the road it might change to even MORE of a split than 50/50?
It makes no sense, yet pundits say it all the time and personally, I have not seen a single instance where another pundit corrected them. Not in public anyway.
It's yanked out like it's a monster set to crush, kill and destroy. What is the threshold for a "split party" that has been voting nearly 50% to 50% in every single state? lmao.
It was split in February, it'll be split at the convention. It'll remain split when most of them vote either Clinton or Obama in November. And in 4 years it'll still be split. "Split" is not a scary monster, it's the way it's been since day one. It's the default normal.
I just said it doesnt matter who you vote for as long as you vote. So whats your point or is it just a natural reflex for you and you cant help yourself?
I just said it doesnt matter who you vote for as long as you vote. So whats your point or is it just a natural reflex for you and you cant help yourself?
No, just saying his one vote won't make much difference, like my vote didn't. Certain states are pretty much givens with their results.
Comment