|
So, is it the media having some twisted bias agenda thus they selectively cherry pick and sensationalize pit bull attacks because they're "big news"?
or..
are there so many more pit bull attacks reported in the news simply because there are more pit bull attacks than other types and breeds?
Which is it? Because I have to say, a lot of people sure seem pretty sick to death of hearing of yet another pit bull attack in the news. Seems like every other week there's one in the news no matter where you're from. Nation-wide that's one hell of a lot of pit bull attacks.
"It's not the dog, it's the owner" -- is that really going to be enough of an argument to keep these dogs from being banned?
If it's indeed not the dog it's the owner then why are the dogs so often destroyed after and attack but the idiot irresponsible owner is let off with barely a fine?
Could it be that at the end of the day it's both the owner and the type of dog?
I'm asking here, don't shoot me.
|