Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzebox
I agree with you. I don't see anything wrong with bringing this stuff up, especially after contacting the company first. I don't see anything wrong with this thread, other than the fact that I think it's common knowledge that RUC isn't an affiliate-friendly program and I'm surprised people are still finding this out every day. I think using the words "cheating" and "shady" are a bit harsh for identifying a traffic leak, and I don't agree with creating threads for the purposes of drawing a lynch mob.
I think Relentless should take a step back from these threads, as his message got lost sometime in the last teencat thread. I was just trying to re-interpret was he was saying to the guys who react emotionally and get into it with him in these threads.
|
We get the message. We got the message when teencat brought up what he thought was suspicious activity. May or may not have been suspicious. You're in it for the money and do not really care that a program is shivving you as long as you're making that paper. I think if a program is shown to be unfriendly to affiliates or engages in shady practices in one area it is quite likely they are making shady moves in other areas. Like rebills. Something I brought up but no one picked up on, at least for the record.
Just some of us choose not to work with programs that appear to be less than reputable. No emotion. Its called business ethics. Some of us have them and some of us do not.
I will say JT's sites look pretty but like Robbie, I've always felt they are awfully generic. They all seem the same and not very real. Glad you guys are banking on them. Good for you.
Enjoy the day!