Quote:
Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks
Completely ignore the fact of the leak itself and turn it into a matter of $/clicks. The fact of the best $/click doesn't mean that you at the same time can't or should not point out a leak. Saying that all comes down to $/clicks but ignoring that leaks effect $/clicks....
Accepting everything as long as "they "are paying best... Even if you have best $/clicks at sponsor A. you still would have had better $/clicks if sponsor A was not shaving... It's not about comparing $/clicks at different sponsors... it's about getting all that one should be credited for.
|
Agreed. What other affiliates see in a thread like this - the sponsor converts pretty well and the affiliate is making bank. But he sees this weird thing happening. He wants to save his traffic with the good sponsor so he wants the sponsor to change the problem.
If Really Useful Cash would claim a rogue employee and remove the pop, everyone would remember it converts well and now has cleaner tours.