JOE FRANCIS RELEASES MODEL ID'S NOW??? (Ashley Dupre's)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Vittorio
    Confirmed User
    • May 2003
    • 1974
    #1

    JOE FRANCIS RELEASES MODEL ID'S NOW??? (Ashley Dupre's)

    I don't know if you guys saw the video & story, but Francis now releases Ashley Dupre's Model ID to defend himself. I thought offering that up to the public is a big No No. Has he further put himself out there on the chopping block?? Comments?

    I know as a content provider, I would have my ass handed to me in here if I ever released a Model's ID publically like he did.


    28 GIGS of Hardcore Content for $69 !!
    Tags: None
    • Kelli58
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2006
      • 2270
      #2
      I'm not sure on this because earlier this year I know a few affiliate programs were offering the model release data including a copy of the model's ID with their downloadable galleries so that they too may be in compliance with the 2257 regulations. I found it WAY creepy but nobody else seemed to care. I was just waiting for the story to come out about how some stalker found <insert porn star name here> because of this practice.

      So really how is this any different?

      I mean she is after all telling the world he is a liar, he's just defending himself. I say fuck her and her bogus ass lawsuit.
      💎 Earn Money by Helping Content Creators Earn More. 💎 The most unique affiliate program in the game. There are more than 1.5 million OnlyFans creators. Here's your chance to make money from them!

        Comment

        • tony299
          lurker
          • Aug 2002
          • 57021
          #3
          Does it matter? They knew she was 17 because they sent her on a bus home when they found out.

            Comment

            • aico
              Moo Moo Cow
              • Mar 2004
              • 14748
              #4
              Ya, cuz nobody knows her real identity.

                Comment

                • vod
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 3510
                  #5
                  GGW will get out of it...


                  Adult Merchant Account

                    Comment

                    • Mutt
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 34431
                      #6
                      I think in the US what he's done is unethical but not illegal - in Canada he'd be breaking privacy laws for sure.
                      I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

                        Comment

                        • Vittorio
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2003
                          • 1974
                          #7
                          I'm also wondering if someone DID have naked pics of her (when she was 18 or older) and promoted it, how many extra sign-ups do you think that program would get??


                          28 GIGS of Hardcore Content for $69 !!

                            Comment

                            • Jens Van Assterdam
                              The Dupre Pimp
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 6677
                              #8
                              Originally posted by Vittorio
                              I'm also wondering if someone DID have naked pics of her (when she was 18 or older) and promoted it, how many extra sign-ups do you think that program would get??
                              Read TOS for signature rules

                                Comment

                                • Vittorio
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2003
                                  • 1974
                                  #9
                                  Machete,

                                  I guess that smiley means a hellava lot...


                                  28 GIGS of Hardcore Content for $69 !!

                                    Comment

                                    • Chris Mac
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Nov 2006
                                      • 398
                                      #10
                                      this shit shit is deep

                                        Comment

                                        • kristin
                                          GOO!
                                          • Sep 2002
                                          • 9768
                                          #11
                                          If someone was suing me for 10 million and I could prove she was of age, or the legal info she provided us was saying she was 18, I'd give it up too.

                                          But I'd make sure I did it legally and the right way.
                                          Vacares rules.

                                          "Usually only fat guys have the kind of knowledge and ability that Kristin has."

                                            Comment

                                            • After Shock Media
                                              It's coming look busy
                                              • Mar 2001
                                              • 35299
                                              #12
                                              Originally posted by Kelli58
                                              I'm not sure on this because earlier this year I know a few affiliate programs were offering the model release data including a copy of the model's ID with their downloadable galleries so that they too may be in compliance with the 2257 regulations. I found it WAY creepy but nobody else seemed to care. I was just waiting for the story to come out about how some stalker found <insert porn star name here> because of this practice.
                                              Honestly this has been going on with content sales for a decade. Was just a big hoopla over last two years, specially since people love to cling to shit and pretend outrage over it. Nobody however even made a whimper when it was just the way things were done, yet once government said boogie boo about affiliates needing documents presto its now an issue.

                                              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                Comment

                                                • gideongallery
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Aug 2003
                                                  • 7082
                                                  #13
                                                  Originally posted by Mutt
                                                  I think in the US what he's done is unethical but not illegal - in Canada he'd be breaking privacy laws for sure.
                                                  you are correct sir

                                                  here is the canadian law you would be violating

                                                  god i love being a canadian

                                                  “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Vittorio
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • May 2003
                                                      • 1974
                                                      #14
                                                      Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                      Honestly this has been going on with content sales for a decade. Was just a big hoopla over last two years, specially since people love to cling to shit and pretend outrage over it. Nobody however even made a whimper when it was just the way things were done, yet once government said boogie boo about affiliates needing documents presto its now an issue.

                                                      I can see content providers giving it to content buyers for their assurance that everything is above board, but to release it to the GENERAL PUBLIC??


                                                      28 GIGS of Hardcore Content for $69 !!

                                                        Comment

                                                        • WiredGuy
                                                          Pounding Googlebot
                                                          • Aug 2002
                                                          • 34515
                                                          #15
                                                          Originally posted by Mutt
                                                          I think in the US what he's done is unethical but not illegal - in Canada he'd be breaking privacy laws for sure.
                                                          That seems correct to me.
                                                          WG
                                                          I play with Google.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • After Shock Media
                                                              It's coming look busy
                                                              • Mar 2001
                                                              • 35299
                                                              #16
                                                              Originally posted by Vittorio
                                                              I can see content providers giving it to content buyers for their assurance that everything is above board, but to release it to the GENERAL PUBLIC??
                                                              I guess that barrier between being able to sign up for free to an affiliate program and spending 5.00 with a content provider via an anonymous payment method to get the models info is sufficient. My bad.

                                                              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Vittorio
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • May 2003
                                                                  • 1974
                                                                  #17
                                                                  Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                                  I guess that barrier between being able to sign up for free to an affiliate program and spending 5.00 with a content provider via an anonymous payment method to get the models info is sufficient. My bad.

                                                                  Good one. Does seem hypocritical, doesn't it.


                                                                  28 GIGS of Hardcore Content for $69 !!

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    Previous template Next
                                                                    Working...