Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
that's funny, what we have been through is a definition:
"the presence in or introduction into the environment of a substance or thing that has harmful or poisonous effects."
so while CO2 might be present in nature, human industries that adds more CO2 to the environment would be considered 'pollution', as the additional CO2 would be considered 'harmful'
|
sadly incorrect. Your take on CO2 is no different than saying releasing extra oxygen in the air would be pollution. Just because an agency wants to tax something and calls it "pollution" to accomplish the taxation does not mean serious people think its pollution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
oh great. you're saying a time with giant fucking lizards is 'normal'
real sharp
|
oh I'm sorry!
I forgot that liberals like yourself like to pick and choose their timeframes and facts to appear to have a point.
I forgot that for a sec.