View Single Post
Old 05-10-2014, 05:59 PM  
dyna mo
not antifa
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible GNC
Posts: 67,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
Public figures and political figures should have a different level of privacy protection from private individuals... the same way they have different levels of protection against defamation than what private individuals get.

Mitt Romney being taped and having the 47% comments made public was a huge breach of privacy... of a political figure... and one that should be allowed.

This instance of recording a very public figure like the owner of the Clippers making racist comments also should be allowed.

Does that mean your neighbor who is neither a political nor public figure should expect the same level of publicity from private phone calls... no.
Sterling wasn't a public figure prior to the tape being released to TMZ, even then, he could very well argue he still isn't a public figure, based on the legal definition.

http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p117.htm
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote