Originally Posted by sperbonzo

I"m curious.... I loath both Democrats and Republicans, but it has been interesting to watch CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC completely drop any hard nosed investigative reporting into civil liberties violations, cover-ups, corruption, etc... under this administration. For example, I find it funny when I see people saying that Obama was not terrible for killing about 5000 people with drones, (300 of them children) in other sovereign countries with whom we are not at war, because Bush killed hundreds of thousands. (It seems like saying "we shouldn't convict this murderer for killing only one kid, since there are serial killers out there".)

So my question is: If hard evidence was to come out that this administration actually lied to the people, covered up things, actively obstructed congresses ability to find out pertinent facts, etc... would the Democrats on this board be upset by that, or would they just say things like, "The other team did it first!", or "The other team did worse stuff!" ?


Or would any evidence, no matter how strong, be automatically dismissed as "political"?



Any thoughts?


Honestly interested to hear....






.