Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
It should also be said (as mr nerd was surely informed) that if they were to come after affiliates for aiding in and befitting from the infringement on their marks, it typically falls under the civil application of RICO (domain name = counterfeiting trademarks etc) which means not only statutory damages but statutory damages X3, so anyone sending traffic could have judgements against them for 6/7 figures.
But yeah, you're a genius and I am nobody.
|
Can you cite a case where that has happened? I'm not arguing with you or looking for a pissing contest. I'm simply asking if you know of any instance where an affiliate marketer was forced by court order to pay 3x damages for unwittingly sending traffic to a sponsor that infringed on another mark or brand? I'd be very interested to know more about that case.
You can post it here on contact me off GFY any time. I'm not aware of any instance where anything similar has happened. Thanks.