Quote:
Originally posted by gothweb
There is illegal content. Any sexually explicit photo on a website is illegal unless 2257 custodian of records information is provided on that website. You are breaking the law.
There is something more I need to say, and I am not sure quite how to say it. Here goes...
While it is true that many of us are disguested with you, and it causes bias in our posts to and about you, that is not all that is going on here. Some of us are genuinely trying to educate you about the laws that you are breaking. Every time one of us tries to explain copyright law, or 2257, or a number of other things, you are dismissing us too quickly. We are making valid points, and you *really are* in violation of a number of laws. I encourage you to open your eyes, and listen to the advice you are being given. Just because you can rationalize a behavior does not mean that the law sees it the same way.
|
GothWeb: I appreciate the help ... I truly do.
If I have been "blinded" by the cursing ... I appologize.
Assuming you are correct ... that 2257 refers to "ALL websites" ... then I would say that 2257 is unconstitional as it forces a magazine to reveal it's sources. If 2257 only refers to "pornographic websites" I can see that ... but I have no intention of revealing the majoritiy of sources for "textual content". Now with regards to graphic content ... I do try to to state the sources ... there may be some old articles I do not ... but I will endevour as a result of recent feed back to be more aware of this need....regardless of whether it is "the law" or not as it makes my website more acceptable to the general adult community. I will work on this issue with expeditious due dilligence (after my other job ..)
CAVEAT: It is the continuous drop of AVS suppliers as a result of similar "charges/lies" that keeps my website broken.
And time in these groups ...