but, if you use it for comerical you need a release (property release)
I don't think so. I've been taking pictures of your "old wrinkled, out of shape ass" using a long lens camera and selling the pics to a tabloid for years. I've had NO trouble selling these horrific images without a release and the magazine has been publishing them without any trouble at all!
You might try closing your blinds or something. You can't do anything about pics of your home.
I think release is needed from a person who is on the photo.
Even if there's no identifiable humans in the photo some circumstances may require a property release to be signed before it is used for commercial purposes.
She used a Canon Sure Shot.
She would take a photo and say the address into a digital voice recorder.
She said she got paid per photo, but didn't say how much
you can take a picture of anything you want that you can walk up to and see from a public place.
a house isnt a public place its private property. If I take a picture of a office building and plan to get paid for that photo.I need a release from the building or they can sue the shit out of me.
Even if there's no identifiable humans in the photo some circumstances may require a property release to be signed before it is used for commercial purposes.
Tell that to Google Earth! They don't give a fluck about your, "release," or anything like that!
You don't need a release in this type of situation, this much is obvious.
a house isnt a public place its private property. If I take a picture of a office building and plan to get paid for that photo.I need a release from the building or they can sue the shit out of me.
Only certain shit man. Example being the Eiffel tower at night only. There are steps one needs to take to prevent such usage. They are just not permitted to step on private property to gain such pictures if someone desires. This also may be prevented if someone lives in a gated community where the streets are typically privately owned.
a house isnt a public place its private property. If I take a picture of a office building and plan to get paid for that photo.I need a release from the building or they can sue the shit out of me.
Really? Interesting since I can bet you can find a picture of your house on your county tax records website And guess what? The person who took that picture got paid to take it.
She used a Canon Sure Shot.
She would take a photo and say the address into a digital voice recorder.
She said she got paid per photo, but didn't say how much
I checked the website in the employment section. They claim around $200 per day, on a per-photo basis. Her story seems to check out. I couldn't quite understand what they are doing with the photos though.
You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.
Only certain shit man. Example being the Eiffel tower at night only. There are steps one needs to take to prevent such usage. They are just not permitted to step on private property to gain such pictures if someone desires. This also may be prevented if someone lives in a gated community where the streets are typically privately owned.
That's because its lightshow is copyrighted [trademarked?] - got nothing to do w/ private property
It's funny how recently in TV shows (reality mostly, I suppose) they've started blurring the artwork in the background. I don't remember this until a few years ago.
Really? Interesting since I can bet you can find a picture of your house on your county tax records website And guess what? The person who took that picture got paid to take it.
Comment