Wordpress SEO vs HTML5 Tube SEO

**just a punk** · 12-08-2013, 06:20 AM

Sorry for a stupid question, but what is a problem to make a HTML5 tube on WordPress?

**Antonio** · 12-08-2013, 06:30 AM

Originally posted by digitaldivas

I was checking stats and most wordpress tubes rank much lower, SEO wise, than a site that happens to have a tube format, but was authored in HTML5.

Also, is it true that the more tube content you put on a wordpress site, the more bogged down it gets, as far as fetching the pages where the video will be playing?

Hmm, Google eats Wordpress sites like there's no tomorrow and you shouldn't have issues with "fetching the pages" either. On a decent virtual host, you should be able to host a site with a few hundred thousand posts easily, once your site grows, simply move it to a VPS or dedicated.

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 06:40 AM

Originally posted by CyberSEO

Sorry for a stupid question, but what is a problem to make a HTML5 tube on WordPress?

Might not be a problem, i just don't know how to do it yet, if it is possible.

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 06:42 AM

Originally posted by Antonio

Hmm, Google eats Wordpress sites like there's no tomorrow and you shouldn't have issues with "fetching the pages" either. On a decent virtual host, you should be able to host a site with a few hundred thousand posts easily, once your site grows, simply move it to a VPS or dedicated.

thanks antonio, that was what i was thinking intiially. i was having a convo with another webmaster the other night and he had said that he was having issues with fetch time for the posts after 4k pages on his WP site. this was after he had installed various WP caching plugins

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 06:55 AM

ok, so this is the custom tube I have been working on. It just seems to load a crapload faster than my current wordpress. it is also alot prettier, imho.

http://tube-erotique.com/new/sheer-nylons-smoking.html

what do you guys think?

**just a punk** · 12-08-2013, 06:57 AM

Originally posted by digitaldivas

Might not be a problem, i just don't know how to do it yet, if it is possible.

Course it is possible. Just use the HTML5-compatible player and make sure all your videos are in mp4 format (flv's won't work on iOS and latest versions of Android because flash is not supported there).

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 06:58 AM

Originally posted by CyberSEO

Course it is possible. Just use the HTML5-compatible player and make sure all your videos are in mp4 format (flv's won't work on iOS and latest versions of Android because flash is not supported there).

oh yes, i got that CyberSEO. thanks. I thought you meant droppable html5 pages, with a "wordpress type" engine.

**PornDiscounts-V** · 12-08-2013, 07:51 AM

The non wordpress tubes dominate not because they aren't using wordpress, but because of why they aren't using wordpress.

Now think about the why.

**Barry-xlovecam** · 12-08-2013, 07:52 AM

What are the page headers?

Code:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />

Many people are serving with the same MIME type as HTML4. That may be why.

Content-Type: text/ html text/ html is called the ?content type? or ?MIME type? of the page. This header is the only thing that determines what a particular resource truly is, and therefore how it should be rendered. Images have their own MIME types (image/ jpeg for JPEG images, image/ png for PNG images, and so on). JavaScript files have their own MIME type. CSS stylesheets have their own MIME type. Everything has its own MIME type. The Web runs on MIME types.

This specification later became known as ?XHTML 1.0?. It defined a new MIME type for XHTML documents, application/ xhtml + xml. However, to ease the migration of existing HTML 4 pages,

Starting with Version 1.1, all XHTML documents were to be served with a MIME type of application/ xhtml + xml.

Pilgrim, Mark (2010-08-06). HTML5: Up and Running O'Reilly Media. Kindle Edition.

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 08:08 AM

Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam

What are the page headers?

Code:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />

Many people are serving with the same MIME type as HTML4. That may be why.

That is actually a fucking valid point, did not even think to look there.

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 08:13 AM

like this example of this custom tube that I am working on
http://www.tube-erotique.com/new/bea...odel-feet.html

the top html is much more web 2.0 friendly

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="html">
<head>

<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>

this, causing more SEO relevancy, unless i am completely mistaken on this point...

what do you guys think?

**digitaldivas** · 12-08-2013, 08:18 AM

...nevermind Barry, you answered it, thanks man

**Stephen** · 12-08-2013, 09:13 AM

Originally posted by digitaldivas

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="html">
<head>

<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>

this, causing more SEO relevancy, unless i am completely mistaken on this point...

what do you guys think?

drop the class="html" and include the base language specification instead

also, in HTML5 you do not escape tag ends: > NOT />

Wordpress SEO vs HTML5 Tube SEO

Wordpress SEO vs HTML5 Tube SEO

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment