Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
BTW...seldom...if ever...is there the possibility of "mutually assured destruction". The term was used during the "cold war" because between the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. each side had around 25,000 nuclear weapons among other weapons...but even then the term was not necessarily true.
|
If not 'mutually assured destruction' - then at least large scale casualties and collateral damage on both sides that would render any claims of winning - a rather hollow victory.