Quote:
Originally Posted by notinmybackyard
Then we agree that he is NOT qualified.
My comment was that
- In physics you have someone that is more or less involved in the understanding of the nature of the universe.
- In theology it is the study of "religion" and "God".
- In anthropology it is people studing the past and present of humanity, humanity's relationship with faith based dichotomies being part of that field.
But ethology and evolutionary biology have nothing to do with the study of the universe, religion or humanity's cultural evolution. Therefore who the hell is Dawkins to act as if he is some sort of expert? As I already said, Dawkins is the latest youtube celebrity clown expressing on opinion on something he knows nothing about.
From the real estate con artist Jacques Frescoe and his 1970s Star Trek fantasy to the illuminati bankers to Richard Dawkins. It is the curse of the Internet.
It is as if every 6 months someone forgets to close the door on Reddit and what I call generation loser and their "do not tell me shit because we are smarter than everyone else" attitude pollutes the gene pool of humanity yet again. |
Actually we don't agree. My point is that there is no way to be qualified to discuss whether or not there is a god. A guy with a PHD is theology is just as qualified as a guy who dropped out of school in the 6th grade and works the McDonald's fryer for a living.
The bottom line is that none of know for sure and there is no amount of education or research that can change that. This guy is just as qualified as anyone else to talk about the existence (or lack thereof) of a god.