Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoHomo
Incredible...so with your "logical" thinking Darwin was just a "clown" who sailed around the world and looked at stuff. 
Dawkins is more than qualified to express his opinion that a god is not necessary for life to evolve to the present day form (humans included). So using the creation of life and/or humans as evidence of god is not needed.
Dawkins was around long before youtube and has been a best selling author since his first book The Selfish Gene came out in 1976 and he coined the term "meme" long before it was applied to discribe the way ideas propogate on the internet so...he certainly is not as you say, "the latest youtube celebrity clown". |
My logical thinking is that you are a fucking clown too.
The theory of evolution being true or otherwise does not prove or refute the existance of God. But your off the wall rant for Dawkins does prove my point about generation loser fan boys basing their opinions and their own existence on some youtube loud mouth. Get off your ass and do something with your life and when you develop your own opinions I will stop considering you a clown.
As for everyone else,
I will say in summation that in my years of life experience it appears to me that everything in the universe evolves except human beings. It might not be an argument for the existence of God but it certainly does appear to point to a malevolent force at work. Or else nature royally messed up when it created us and we are too stupid to survive making this debate is pointless.