GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Really Useful Limited Says .XXX Performing Better Than .Com?s

PornMD · 10-16-2013, 04:10 PM

I do think it's horseshit that .xxx is outranking a similar .com under similar conditions for adult terms on the basis that Google "prequalifies" .xxx as more fitting. Having said that, I'm sure after building up on them that they may get some rankings (due to lots of links etc.) and that even as a watermark on tube vids that they could increase type-ins over the typical .com. But IMO no way in hell they'd have higher type-ins over similarly costed .com or even the same .net. I could be wrong, but with how few .xxx I ever come across in search, I don't see how most avg people would be aware it's even an extension. It's not like it's in the press anymore.

10-16-2013, 04:10 PM
PornMD Mainstream Businessman Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 9,291	I do think it's horseshit that .xxx is outranking a similar .com under similar conditions for adult terms on the basis that Google "prequalifies" .xxx as more fitting. Having said that, I'm sure after building up on them that they may get some rankings (due to lots of links etc.) and that even as a watermark on tube vids that they could increase type-ins over the typical .com. But IMO no way in hell they'd have higher type-ins over similarly costed .com or even the same .net. I could be wrong, but with how few .xxx I ever come across in search, I don't see how most avg people would be aware it's even an extension. It's not like it's in the press anymore. __________________ Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.