This whole spitzer thing really stinks.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tony286
    lurker
    • Aug 2002
    • 57021

    #1

    This whole spitzer thing really stinks.

    He was transferring less than 10k from his bank account, a few times.This is a wealthy man. This for some reason makes the bank flag this to the irs who then flag it to the feds.They then wire tap him. Sounds more and more like someone wanted Elliot no longer in public office.
  • David!
    By the wrath of Agamemnon
    • Apr 2004
    • 6501

    #2
    Maybe because he ruined so many people's live when he was the AG and made sure to prosecute men who "dared" to "hire" prostitues?
    Karma's a bitch !!!
    .

    Comment

    • tony299
      lurker
      • Aug 2002
      • 57021

      #3
      Originally posted by PussyMan
      Maybe because he ruined so many people's live when he was the AG and made sure to prosecute men who "dared" to "hire" prostitues?
      Karma's a bitch !!!
      I can go with that.

      Comment

      • L-Pink
        working on my tan
        • Mar 2005
        • 39151

        #4
        Originally posted by tony404
        He was transferring less than 10k from his bank account, a few times.This is a wealthy man. This for some reason makes the bank flag this to the irs who then flag it to the feds.They then wire tap him. Sounds more and more like someone wanted Elliot no longer in public office.
        I thought the problem was DEPOSITING more than 10 thousand.

        Comment

        • The Judge
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2006
          • 1647

          #5
          You sure about that? Show me a link where it says he went after the Johns. He went after the big $$$ wall-street sharks, so look there for your answer

          Originally posted by PussyMan
          Maybe because he ruined so many people's live when he was the AG and made sure to prosecute men who "dared" to "hire" prostitues?
          Karma's a bitch !!!

          Comment

          • tony299
            lurker
            • Aug 2002
            • 57021

            #6
            Originally posted by L-Pink
            I thought the problem was DEPOSITING more than 10 thousand.
            No I was watching the news he was transferring less then 10k and this is a man worth millions. So it wasnt like someone with nothing all of a sudden is doing this.

            Comment

            • baddog
              So Fucking Banned
              • Apr 2001
              • 107089

              #7
              Originally posted by L-Pink
              I thought the problem was DEPOSITING more than 10 thousand.
              Not sure about deposits, but I know for sure withdrawals of $10k must be reported.

              Been that way for a long time. I remember when I was a negotiator my boss always made them for $9,900 just for that reason.

              Comment

              • Tempest
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • May 2004
                • 10217

                #8
                I know up here in Canada it's deposits, not sure about withdrawls... There was a Soprano's episode where they mentioned it as well and it was for a deposit.

                What stinks more is that you can't be human and run for office... A person needs to have life experience IMO to lead... that means some bad as well as the good.

                Comment

                • L-Pink
                  working on my tan
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 39151

                  #9
                  Originally posted by baddog
                  Not sure about deposits, but I know for sure withdrawals of $10k must be reported.

                  Been that way for a long time. I remember when I was a negotiator my boss always made them for $9,900 just for that reason.
                  Yea, it's for cash transactions over 10 grand but I thought the reasoning was to prevent drug money from being laundered. Here this poor millionaire withdraws legal amounts to spend and gets a Federal wiretap.

                  If anything needs investigated it's how he ended up getting the Feds on his tail.

                  Comment

                  • LiveDose
                    Show Yer Tits!
                    • Feb 2002
                    • 25792

                    #10
                    Originally posted by tony404
                    He was transferring less than 10k from his bank account, a few times.This is a wealthy man. This for some reason makes the bank flag this to the irs who then flag it to the feds.They then wire tap him. Sounds more and more like someone wanted Elliot no longer in public office.


                    He is a scumbag who had many many enemies. He fucked a lot of people over.

                    Burn baby burn.

                    Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

                    Comment

                    • JFK
                      FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 67369

                      #11
                      Originally posted by L-Pink
                      Yea, it's for cash transactions over 10 grand but I thought the reasoning was to prevent drug money from being laundered. Here this poor millionaire withdraws legal amounts to spend and gets a Federal wiretap.

                      If anything needs investigated it's how he ended up getting the Feds on his tail.
                      its all politics, bottom line, Hillary all of a sudden loses her biggest supporter ?

                      FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                      For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                      Comment

                      • baddog
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Apr 2001
                        • 107089

                        #12
                        So this "stinks" because a Democrat got popped? If he was a Republican you'd be dancing in the streets?

                        Comment

                        • Fap
                          Just Du It
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 12094

                          #13
                          Good riddance, Spitzer was a turd anyway, always lookin for trouble

                          Comment

                          • tony299
                            lurker
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 57021

                            #14
                            Originally posted by baddog
                            So this "stinks" because a Democrat got popped? If he was a Republican you'd be dancing in the streets?
                            Don't put words in my mouth.Im a independent and I dont have blind party loyalty like yourself.

                            Comment

                            • baddog
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Apr 2001
                              • 107089

                              #15
                              Originally posted by tony404
                              Don't put words in my mouth.Im a independent and I dont have blind party loyalty like yourself.
                              I have been a Democrat for 36 years. I asked two questions, neither of which you answered.

                              Comment

                              • tony299
                                lurker
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 57021

                                #16
                                Originally posted by baddog
                                I have been a Democrat for 36 years.
                                I doubt that for some reason. lol

                                Comment

                                • baddog
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Apr 2001
                                  • 107089

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by tony404
                                  I doubt that for some reason. lol
                                  Why, because I do not have blind party loyalty? I knew I should have scanned in my sample primary ballot before tossing it.

                                  Comment

                                  • tony299
                                    lurker
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 57021

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by baddog
                                    Why, because I do not have blind party loyalty? I knew I should have scanned in my sample primary ballot before tossing it.
                                    Just the way you have spoke in the past. I really dont care but I dont like words put in my mouth. I was just posting an observation from watching the news.

                                    Comment

                                    • baddog
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Apr 2001
                                      • 107089

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by tony404
                                      Just the way you have spoke in the past. I really dont care but I dont like words put in my mouth. I was just posting an observation from watching the news.
                                      I asked two questions:

                                      1. Do you think it stinks because he is a Democrat?
                                      1a. If no, why do you think it stinks?

                                      2. Would you be elated if this was a Republican scandal?

                                      Comment

                                      • CaptainHowdy
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Dec 2004
                                        • 94108

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by PussyMan
                                        Maybe because he ruined so many people's live when he was the AG and made sure to prosecute men who "dared" to "hire" prostitues?
                                        Karma's a bitch !!!
                                        Let's just laugh then...

                                        Comment

                                        • tony299
                                          lurker
                                          • Aug 2002
                                          • 57021

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by baddog
                                          I asked two questions:

                                          1. Do you think it stinks because he is a Democrat?
                                          1a. If no, why do you think it stinks?

                                          2. Would you be elated if this was a Republican scandal?
                                          1. no
                                          1a. Because its like big brother watching. We hear about terrorists could strike here at any minute and the fbi have nothing better to do.Then go after a guy who likes to fuck whores.
                                          2. I dont like the circumstances he was caught it wouldnt matter what party he was from.

                                          Comment

                                          • madfuck
                                            Registered User
                                            • Oct 2004
                                            • 2032

                                            #22
                                            its whtevr

                                            Comment

                                            • Gouge
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Mar 2005
                                              • 1438

                                              #23
                                              I dont see how it stinks, he swore an oath to uphold the law but instead violated the public trust. Consorting with criminals opens the door to extortion and bribery. He dropped up to $80,000 on sex with prostitutes according to the records from the Emperors Club. It's amazing this kind of stuff still goes on. All public officials should know that any kind of illegal action will eventually come to light. We live in a society where there are no secrets anymore because there's no privacy anymore.

                                              Comment

                                              • dav3
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • May 2007
                                                • 7348

                                                #24
                                                Maybe his prostitution stings worked a little too well? hehe
                                                Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

                                                Comment

                                                • baddog
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • Apr 2001
                                                  • 107089

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by tony404
                                                  1. no
                                                  1a. Because its like big brother watching. We hear about terrorists could strike here at any minute and the fbi have nothing better to do.Then go after a guy who likes to fuck whores.
                                                  2. I dont like the circumstances he was caught it wouldnt matter what party he was from.
                                                  Interstate transportation of whores is what brought the FBI in I suspect.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Bill8
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                    • 1901

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by baddog
                                                    Interstate transportation of whores is what brought the FBI in I suspect.
                                                    Actually, no.

                                                    His bank reported "suspicious transactions" months before - they started watching him. They discovered the prosty thing because they were watching him.

                                                    They used a modification of the 10,000 limit inserted into the patriot act, that allows them to look for lesser amounts to find terrorists, to flag his banking and authorize the surveillance.

                                                    It's explained in these two articles.

                                                    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4424507&page=1

                                                    http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8211

                                                    Comment

                                                    • L-Pink
                                                      working on my tan
                                                      • Mar 2005
                                                      • 39151

                                                      #27
                                                      If this was anyone on GFY we would still be making cash withdrawals and running hookers across state lines (about 15% probably are anyway) ... This poor guy got nailed because of who he is, not what he was doing. Serves him right though for preaching about his own vices.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • baddog
                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                        • Apr 2001
                                                        • 107089

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by Bill8
                                                        Actually, no.

                                                        His bank reported "suspicious transactions" months before - they started watching him. They discovered the prosty thing because they were watching him.

                                                        They used a modification of the 10,000 limit inserted into the patriot act, that allows them to look for lesser amounts to find terrorists, to flag his banking and authorize the surveillance.

                                                        It's explained in these two articles.

                                                        http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4424507&page=1

                                                        http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8211
                                                        Ah the old Viagra theory. Looking for one thing and found another.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • V_RocKs
                                                          Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                                                          • Nov 2003
                                                          • 32451

                                                          #29
                                                          I stand corrected.
                                                          Last edited by V_RocKs; 03-11-2008, 11:43 PM.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Bill8
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Oct 2001
                                                            • 1901

                                                            #30
                                                            I figure the interesting part of the story now is, are we going to learn more about the investigation? or is everything going to be shushed up?

                                                            I'm sure they are going to try to make all the messy details of the investigation go away, and concentrate on the anal sex.

                                                            Everyone loves a good anal sex scandal.

                                                            Comment

                                                            Working...