Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken
Dude..............
For the third time:
a) CA with better taxation for business
b) CA with worse taxation for business
a would attract more businesses than b, a would keep more businesses than b. Thats simple logical fact.
If b provides growth (as you suggest) then a would provide even bigger growth.
How difficult is it to grasp?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderBalls
Once again, facts are not originated with something you think you know or heard, its based on hard data for which you have provided none of.
|
If I paid you $16 hourly to flip hamburgers, as opposed to $8 hourly - you would have twice as much money and I would have less profit. You would be able to afford more necessities and I would be have less money for luxuries. The combined amount of taxes we would pay would go towards projects other than funding welfare programs that you would be applying for if I was paying you $8 hourly, and if this was the case, I would then have little choice but to refer to you as a broke fucking moron loser for choosing to work for me instead of someone else willing to give you valuable on the job training skills that would secure you a $24 to $48 hourly wage in the future. What this boils down to is, you are only valuable to me and society if you make no more than $8 hourly and can live without any public financial aid.
See?
You don't always need hard statistical data to prove something.
__________________
.
Approach the mirrored reflection saying his name three times : "Butcher .... Butcher .... Butcher ....."
and wait to see if this Bogeyman urban legend manifests in the background, looming over shoulder
While your neighbors were busy killing off everyone in the neighborhood
with your own butcher knife in hand concealed behind your back
you stood for
ever before the window saying
nothing