Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
And what's your suggestion considering Obama told the Syrians and the world that the United States wouldn't stand for the use of chemical weapons against anybody let along children and women? Launching a few cruise missiles at targets where chemical weapons are thought to be stored after giving them 2 weeks to move shit is pathetic. If that's all Obama has up his sleeve Assad and Iran will just laugh. I agree with McCain, the US invests billions and billions into high tech weaponry so US soldiers don't have to die. Deliver Assad a truly punishing blow OR get on TV and apologize to the country and the world for being such a dumbass.
|
Obviously, we have to make some sort of response to the use of chemical weapons but it sure as hell doesn't need to be US troops on the ground. Do I think a missile strike will do much? Likely not, but that's about as much as we should do. It's a civil war it's not our fight. The only reason we are even involved is to protect US business interest in the region and to put another knife in Russia's back.