Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_PM
Like I said to my friend who messaged me about that newer case.. it all depends on the laws there. In most ways it bears no resemblance to the GZ case, but in critical ones it's hardly different. In the end, they both came down to what the shooter thought or felt was about to happen if he didn't shoot. Is it possible that that is the real issue? Just asking questions here.
|
that certainly seems like a logical starting point. not unlike the black guy smoke shop owner who was setup by the informant in a video posted here, a local political figure in that town being interviewed about it is the one that made it into a race issue.
but, secondly, but let's say the guy in la is a racist. now what? let's blow that up into a race war via the media.
even if the guy is a racist it's a non-issue in the matter. it's not a conspiracy. generally speaking, the judicial system will sort it out the guilty based on the crime, regardless of if this guy has ss tatooed on his neck or not.
not saying your view is that, just expanding on how all of this is non-sensical.