|
What struck me as odd about that juror was that in her interview she stated she was sure that it was Zimmerman crying out for help in the 911 tape. But how could she have been sure? Even the experts didn't know with the voice analysis they had. Both sets of parents were claiming it was their son. It's very bold to be sure and not consistent with someone who is objective and rational.
Regarding these accusations I do think it's just speculation. But given Taaffe?s statements it might be enough for at least an investigation. Deliberation went on for two days so it is possible that a juror could have tried to contact someone over night.
That she was the wife of an attorney did not sit too well with me. It could be my bias but I question whether it was appropriate for her to be on the jury. It's possible she made herself jury foreman based on being "the wife of an attorney" and then went on to basically take over everything telling everyone what they must do because "she knows better". A couple of her statements suggest to me that she was heavily on Zimmerman's side more so than she let on. The voice on the 911 call is but one example of this.
__________________
You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.
|