Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I don't believe it would make the court impartial at all.
|
This is the problem, you are confusing your opinions on everything with fact and the letter of the law and what is reasonable in the eyes of everyone and the judicial system.... not just yourself.
The funny thing about you saying these things is that if you were on trial for murder and a 3rd party was telling you "we'll provide witnesses for your defense... good luck", you would object to that for a multitude of obvious reasons.
You honestly can't see that? Do you want the most conservative, right leaning and religious judge in the nation trying to appoint witnesses to testify in a gay love triangle murder... and then are seriously going to argue that was a fair and unbiased process?
Furthermore, i fail to see how its not glaringly obvious how this is a conflict of interest, how it affects the impartiality of the court, since the quality/qualifications of the witness are subjective opinions and so on and so on and so on.