Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls
I am not trying to play gotcha with you...just trying to figure out what you are trying to argue in the first place. First I thought you, assuming ZIM's defense role, where going to argue the inappropriateness of the President's speech by having expert witnesses dissect the speech in a court of law. That's why I responded that your plan wouldn't work...and I gave you the reasons why.
Now if all you are saying is that you simply want to dissect the President's speech in front of the general public, outside of a court proceeding, then that's fine...no one is preventing you from doing that...have the freedom of speech to do so. You don't have to follow the rules of a trial court.
|
i see, i was expanding on my original position, that it's unbecoming of a president to speak to such matters like he did. as i thought about it, it occurred to me that turnabout is fair play in this regard and obama really did give the defense something to make a stink over, which is how i look at defenses/defense attorneys, all they need to do is throw a wrench in the plan, anywhere, client walks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda
wasn't for the supposed beating was a civil rights violation.. code for you'd better lock him up we are going to burn shit down again
|
ahh, that's how it went.