Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
i can promise ya you can try and gotcha me all ya want and it won't make you right or make a diff. i'm chatting in a thread, it's not gonna make a difference anywhere.
nevertheless, certainly you had the option of seeing that my comment you quoted is 2 thoughts.
1. tainted jury pool and being able to argue that.
2. playing the game of swaying public opinion.
hmm all ya want, feel good.  |
I am not trying to play gotcha with you...just trying to figure out what you are trying to argue in the first place. First I thought you, assuming ZIM's defense role, where going to argue the inappropriateness of the President's speech by having expert witnesses dissect the speech in a court of law. That's why I responded that your plan wouldn't work...and I gave you the reasons why.
Now if all you are saying is that you simply want to dissect the President's speech in front of the general public, outside of a court proceeding, then that's fine...no one is preventing you from doing that...have the freedom of speech to do so. You don't have to follow the rules of a trial court.