Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
it absolutely would work. arguing law isn't about arguing law, it's about persuasion.
of course due process is not required outside a courtroom, i didn't think i had to specify i was referring to courtroom processes and a defendant having the right to an untainted jury pool. and i can bring in dozens of experts that can dissect that speech down into the most sophisticated data you've ever seen showing its influence on masses people.  |
Again your plan wouldn't work because the President's speech was not entered into trial evidence in the first place...so there is nothing to dissect.
Furthermore, the defense already agreed and were satisfied with the current jurors. Obviously ZIM felt they were untainted enough to proceed with trial or else they would have made a motion to change trial venue.