my daughter's new best friend who is 12 text messaged me one night. first few days it was innocent chat and then she started asking me all sorts of questions. no she wants me to teach her some stuff. she says she loves me and she makes it clear without me even mentioning it that she wont tell anyone. i love this girl the is terrific and beautiful
I believe this will motivate others to actually do stuff with children.
Looks like the 2008 registrants are going to be the dumbest ones EVER...
Are you afraid this link will get to people that look for child porn on this forum? There aren't any child porn images, the site is LEGAL in The Netherlands....
Its an organisation that fights for the right to have sex with children.
By making an issue over such a forum you're just making it more popular.
The site is legal as you said yourself and although i totally disagree with its purpose and it should be blown off the face of the earth it wont be any time soon simply because it is legal.
So whilst its legal you're fighting a loosing battle.
Also your script wont do anything but just generate more traffic
and possibly give your site a bad name for "Supporting" such a forum.
By making an issue over such a forum you're just making it more popular.
The site is legal as you said yourself and although i totally disagree with its purpose and it should be blown off the face of the earth it wont be any time soon simply because it is legal.
So whilst its legal you're fighting a loosing battle.
Also your script wont do anything but just generate more traffic
and possibly give your site a bad name for "Supporting" such a forum.
Its worthless traffic, as those visitors will not know they visited the website ever.
And I personally believe we should act on this, and take it down by working together. Doesn't everyone hate pedo's? My opinion is to let them know that what they do can not be tolerated ever.
It wouldn't be me taking the site down, or anyone else. It would be people (thousants of webmasters) that help take the website down just to make a statement. To scare off newbe pedo's to not to become a pedo.
Last edited by Ace of Babes; 02-26-2008, 05:29 AM.
not only are you stupid for posting this url on gfy but what you propose is illegal in itself.
I understand, however, maybe someone from Russia could organize this and in the end we all will help doing it. It would be just like Napster and Limewire.
I wouldn't get involved in anything illegal to bring down a site which is - as you point out - illegal but by the standards of most immoral. I understand the vigilante mentality and I understand the strength of your convictions. You are probably better off trying to write local politicians to affect some sort of legal change. If you can't do that then I think it is just something you will have to live with.
You have got to be joking right..How the fuck can that be legal...thats just fucked up and sick
Yes, that is exactly what I believe but here it is just legal (I am not a law expert so I do not know why).
Last year the site got in the news, as the prince of The Netherlands sued the website for pictures that were posted from his new born doughter with comments like "sexy leggs, I would dream doing this and that" etc.
As you may know, Marijuana is legal here aswell and also sex with animals is legal here...
The Netherlands is the number one country for beastiality I believe.
Try emailing church forums instead of adult webmasters. This shit makes everyone nervous.
Who other then webmasters can do something about it from a difrent perspective? We hold the knowledge about the internet, and politicians are unable/unwilling to help as it seems.
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A Dutch court has banned a Web site sympathetic to pedophiles from showing photographs of child members of the royal family, including the three-year-old heiress to the throne Princess Amalia.
Last week the Dutch government said it would seek a court injunction after pictures of Amalia and her cousins Lucas and Anna appeared on the Web site of the Dutch pedophile association Martijn.
The court said on Thursday the Web site was violating the princess's privacy and the right to control how pictures of her were used.
"Our royal family has produced a whole new generation of princes and princesses. How fortunate!" a caption had read on the site that promotes more social acceptance of pedophilia.
The pictures, including an official portrait of Amalia in a summer dress, were removed from the Web site after the government statement on Friday.
However, the association argued it was not responsible for the content placed on members' forums and it could not prevent members from uploading photos. It could only remove the photos afterwards.
The court ruled Martijn had to take precautionary measures to prevent pictures of young royals appearing on the Web site in the future.
A government spokesman said on Thursday that following the ruling, other parents could take on the Web site and force it to remove pictures of their children.
Possession and distribution of child pornography is illegal in the Netherlands and the Dutch government is also preparing laws to outlaw watching child porn on websites without downloading pictures.
Last year, members of the Martijn group set up a political party to campaign for a cut in the age of consent from 16 to 12, and the legalization of child pornography. The party failed to get enough support to run in the national election.
Amalia is the eldest daughter of Crown Prince Willem-Alexander and is second in the line to the throne after her father.
If you do what you want to do they can and will sue you and also posting on a public forum that youre gonna be involved in illegal activities is as stupid as it can get.
No matter how you do it, records will show that all these people visited this site if you send them there, and that's not cool because not only are you sending them somewhere they probably would never go, you're doing it against their will.
So you want to abuse the IP's of "normal" porn surfers? If I was a porn site surfer and someone would load CP related sites with my IP and leave a trace without being informed or agreeing to this I would be really pissed off.
You cannot abuse other people to fight for your goal.
So you want to abuse the IP's of "normal" porn surfers? If I was a porn site surfer and someone would load CP related sites with my IP and leave a trace without being informed or agreeing to this I would be really pissed off.
You cannot abuse other people to fight for your goal.
This is a good point, however I would believe they would understand if they would learn about the cause that will actually help to get such sites off the internet. You could place a small banner like the ASACP banner to tell surfers what is going on.
And I do not believe it is illegal, as for now just an idea is discussed about taking action to get a website down that contributes to child porn world wide.
This is a good point, however I would believe they would understand if they would learn about the cause that will actually help to get such sites off the internet. You could place a small banner like the ASACP banner to tell surfers what is going on.
And I do not believe it is illegal, as for now just an idea is discussed about taking action to get a website down that contributes to child porn world wide.
You can't use 'I believe they would understand.' because you don't know if they would.
You can fight your little crusades on your own, I leave that stuff up to law enforcement that specializes in dealing with it. If I find anything questionable I go to Cybertip.ca and that is where my role in fixing the problem is finished.
If you were to do that to me, I wouldn't 'understand' I would be pissed. Even if I knew the cause or whatever I would be pissed.
If you want to take on a website then do it on your own, don't bring other people into it no matter what they might 'understand' because when you start talking like that then you're trying to impose your views on others.
Originally posted by Ace of Babes
This is a good point, however I would believe they would understand if they would learn about the cause that will actually help to get such sites off the internet. You could place a small banner like the ASACP banner to tell surfers what is going on.
And I do not believe it is illegal, as for now just an idea is discussed about taking action to get a website down that contributes to child porn world wide.
Why don't you figure out a legal route to take that site down... that doesn't involve fucking over innocent wankers?
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
You can't use 'I believe they would understand.' because you don't know if they would.
You can fight your little crusades on your own, I leave that stuff up to law enforcement that specializes in dealing with it. If I find anything questionable I go to Cybertip.ca and that is where my role in fixing the problem is finished.
If you were to do that to me, I wouldn't 'understand' I would be pissed. Even if I knew the cause or whatever I would be pissed.
If you want to take on a website then do it on your own, don't bring other people into it no matter what they might 'understand' because when you start talking like that then you're trying to impose your views on others.
Sure, tell that to a dad that uses his website to help take down a legal website that promotes pedophelia... I believe the reply to your suggested response from users may be just as strong, to protect their children and those of others.
I may be ignorant in this, as I have no legal knowledge about this issue. However, I do believe that people will understand if a webmaster and father will use his knowledge to protect his and other people's children.
The site and organisation aren't illegal. You know, there's such a thing as freedom of expression, however disgusting the intents of that organisation are.
Sure, tell that to a dad that uses his website to help take down a legal website that promotes pedophelia... I believe the reply to your suggested response from users may be just as strong, to protect their children and those of others.
I may be ignorant in this, as I have no legal knowledge about this issue. However, I do believe that people will understand if a webmaster and father will use his knowledge to protect his and other people's children.
Man, 90% of the surfers are already afraid to visit adult sites and delete all traces etc after surfing for their wife, boss, whatever and youre saying they would understand it if they load a pedo site in the bg??? Are you retarded or what? You really have to be a bit slow to think they way you think.
Why don't you figure out a legal route to take that site down... that doesn't involve fucking over innocent wankers?
Well, there are enaufh legal experts in The Netherlands who are surely willing to do that so it must be impossible. The site has been sued by the royal family and its still online...
The site and organisation aren't illegal. You know, there's such a thing as freedom of expression, however disgusting the intents of that organisation are.
You're really naive.
Well, that may be true but I am looking at the danger of that site. It PROMOTES pedophilia. Do you understand that it indirectly means: more harmed children?
Man, 90% of the surfers are already afraid to visit adult sites and delete all traces etc after surfing for their wife, boss, whatever and youre saying they would understand it if they load a pedo site in the bg??? Are you retarded or what? You really have to be a bit slow to think they way you think.
Yes, I understand. This is a good point that will not allow my concept to be aplied.
However, there may be other ways to rome. For example white-spyware that will use like 5% of your bandwidth to hit the martijn website all day.
Sure, tell that to a dad that uses his website to help take down a legal website that promotes pedophelia... I believe the reply to your suggested response from users may be just as strong, to protect their children and those of others.
I may be ignorant in this, as I have no legal knowledge about this issue. However, I do believe that people will understand if a webmaster and father will use his knowledge to protect his and other people's children.
I wrote 10 minutes long a reply but i did not post it because u don't get it anyway
I wrote 10 minutes long a reply but i did not post it because u don't get it anyway
Right, I don't. I understand that surfers do not want to be linked with CP and that my idea is not going to work. However, there may be other solutions and I really do not understand the replies on this forum.
I remember these kind of discussions on the forums (GFY and others) in the past, and the replies were totally difrent then. Webmasters were actually all getting together to work on it and in that time the ASACP was founded aswell, then named Adult Sites Against Child Porn.
Right, I don't. I understand that surfers do not want to be linked with CP and that my idea is not going to work. However, there may be other solutions and I really do not understand the replies on this forum.
I remember these kind of discussions on the forums (GFY and others) in the past, and the replies were totally difrent then. Webmasters were actually all getting together to work on it and in that time the ASACP was founded aswell, then named Adult Sites Against Child Porn.
It seems a lot has changed since then.
Oke say i was a moslim and i thought that gay loving is much worse then have sex whit a 12 year old. Is it oke for me to try to get down all gay sites? If it is legal in a country live whit it or try to do something on it in the local politcs.
I remember these kind of discussions on the forums (GFY and others) in the past, and the replies were totally difrent then. Webmasters were actually all getting together to work on it and in that time the ASACP was founded aswell, then named Adult Sites Against Child Porn.
Right, I don't. I understand that surfers do not want to be linked with CP and that my idea is not going to work. However, there may be other solutions and I really do not understand the replies on this forum.
I remember these kind of discussions on the forums (GFY and others) in the past, and the replies were totally difrent then. Webmasters were actually all getting together to work on it and in that time the ASACP was founded aswell, then named Adult Sites Against Child Porn.
It seems a lot has changed since then.
I think you presented a poor solution to the problem. These people are really sick I am sure and I doubt anyone here would disagree. Asking people to break the law is a really bad start. No matter how strongly you feel about the issue.
Did ASACP ever advocate illegal actions?
So basically you came on the forum (or are using a nick) and started off by asking people if breaking the law to right a wrong is a good idea and now people quite possibly don't trust your judgement enough to get behind you on some other action.
Comment