Quote:
Originally Posted by Best-In-BC
WTF does that have to do with giving some fucking goof ball cop the right to do that, it should be a straight up guilty if you refuse to blow like it is here, that kind of shit is wrong.
|
i suspect it boils down to a constitutional matter and how evidence is used and such, haven't researched it but based on what i posted earlier from findlaw. but as it layed out, drunk drivers can avoid a dui otherwise.
p.s. richard, i am not advocating holding people down and jabbing them with syringes, i am simply sharing what may be the roadblock on why a refusal to get checked is not a straight up guilty.