Quote:
Originally Posted by Webmaster Advertising
So basically, condom only porn DOESNT protect adult performers from contracting HIV.
But surely AB332 being law should have prevented this from happening, I mean, wasn't that the whole reason behind passing this little law?  |
Sometimes it's almost too frustrating to read what's posted here at GFY.
An adult performer has tested positive for HIV. This performer worked exclusively on condom only sets. As a precautionary measure, APHSS is providing retests for the small number of performers with which the infected individual had performed.
All retests have come back negative and
there is no indication that any transmission?
including that of the positive performer?happened on set.
As of this article....
1. We do not know where this performer contracted HIV.
2. We DO know that it did not spread from performer to performer on set.
3. We DO know that testing identified it.
Perhaps this performer contracted HIV from a non industry related partner. Regardless, at this point, this should be viewed as a win / win all the way around.
In the gen pop, according to the CDC there were 47,500 reported new cases of HIV in 2010 and an estimated 1,148,200 persons aged 13 and older were living with HIV infection in the United States, including 207,600 (18.1%) persons whose infections had not been diagnosed.
Source