NEW HIV plus just reported

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mikesouth
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2003
    • 6334

    #1

    NEW HIV plus just reported

    In fairness XBiz broke it...but I will get to the bottom of it ;)

    No info on who it is

    All they are saying is that he tested positive, he/she worked condom only and they dont think he/she got it on set

    Now guess who released that info? if you guessed APHSS “We wont know anyones status” you guessed right.

    I will follow up on this.
    Last edited by mikesouth; 06-14-2013, 12:18 PM.
    Mike South

    It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
  • _Richard_
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Oct 2006
    • 30991

    #2
    that's just peachy

    Comment

    • Socks
      Confirmed User
      • May 2002
      • 8475

      #3
      Gentlemen, plug your anuses.

      Hide your hoes.

      Comment

      • fitzmulti
        I Like Depth Of Field!
        • Jan 2003
        • 14861

        #4
        The page via XBIZ:
        http://www.xbiz.com/news/163936


        www.SexyGirlsCash.com


        CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM //
        {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

        Comment

        • Grapesoda
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jul 2003
          • 46238

          #5
          Originally posted by mikesouth
          In fairness XBiz broke it...but I will get to the bottom of it ;)

          No info on who it is

          All they are saying is that he tested positive, he/she worked condom only and they dont think he/she got it on set

          Now guess who released that info? if you guessed APHSS ?We wont know anyones status? you guessed right.

          I will follow up on this.
          sounds like the gay side?

          Comment

          • mikesouth
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2003
            • 6334

            #6
            Originally posted by Grapesoda
            sounds like the gay side?
            or a female...I know of no active male performers working exclusively with condoms

            so if its female look to a wicked contract girl (this is really really really unlikely)

            but also remember the source is APHSS "Not even we will know your status"

            The truth will come out though...always does meantime anyoine that knows anything is welcome to back channel me....your anonymity is guaranteed.
            Mike South

            It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

            Comment

            • PillWealth
              Registered User
              • Sep 2012
              • 46

              #7
              wow, that sucks.
              $35-$40 Per Trial, Male Enhancement & Muscle Supplements
              http://www.pillwealth.com

              Comment

              • Socks
                Confirmed User
                • May 2002
                • 8475

                #8
                Originally posted by mikesouth
                The truth will come out though...always does meantime anyoine that knows anything is welcome to back channel me....your anonymity is guaranteed.
                NSA will know.

                Comment

                • DWB
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 31779

                  #9
                  So someone caught HIV who only worked with condoms, yet they think it was caught off the set where they obviously didn't have sex with condoms? One then needs to ask, why only work with condoms if you're willing to screw off cam without them?

                  That makes as much sense to me as girls without dicks.

                  Comment

                  • _Richard_
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 30991

                    #10
                    Originally posted by DWB
                    So someone caught HIV who only worked with condoms, yet they think it was caught off the set where they obviously didn't have sex with condoms? One then needs to ask, why only work with condoms if you're willing to screw off cam without them?

                    That makes as much sense to me as girls without dicks.
                    could very well have been a 'off the hook night' gone very wrong

                    Comment

                    • mikesouth
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6334

                      #11
                      well consider the source so far is APHSS what does THAT tell you?

                      APHSS says they dont get results. How did they get this one?

                      How do they know it didn’t happen on set? was it a gay performer?

                      Where did APHSS get the idea that it didn’t happen on set? What do they base that on?

                      You probably know most of these answers as well as I do, apart from the fact there’s another HIV positive performer APHSS pulled the rest out of their ass.
                      Mike South

                      It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                      Comment

                      • srockhard
                        Retired
                        • Jul 2011
                        • 1976

                        #12
                        I'm sorry I didn't see this thread when I posted this... http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1112538
                        Piper Pines

                        Comment

                        • mikesouth
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 6334

                          #13
                          from the sword

                          http://thesword.com/exclusive-gay-po...y-measure.html

                          According to multiple sources, The Sword can confirm that a male gay porn performer has tested positive for HIV. The positive results came back after routine testing for a scheduled shoot with Men.com.

                          Given that Men.com’s shoots are condom-only, it’s highly unlikely that the performer contracted HIV while on set. Also, the performer is said to have worked “exclusively” in condom-only productions.

                          When reached for comment, Free Speech Coalition’s Diane Duke confirmed the single case of HIV:

                          An adult performer has tested positive for HIV. This performer worked exclusively on condom only sets. As a precautionary measure, APHSS is providing retests for the small number of performers with which the infected individual had performed. All retests have come back negative and there is no indication that any transmission—including that of the positive performer—happened on set.

                          Duke would not confirm or deny where the performer had worked (or even his gender), but The Sword can confirm that multiple models working for Men.com (including one Men.com exclusive) have been contacted by APHSS and have been asked to come in for a retest. So far, no other results have come back positive.

                          Again, it’s important to reiterate that all of Men.com’s shoots are condom-only, and they have (quite clearly) a testing protocol in place. Meaning, the system worked and caught what it was supposed to catch.
                          Mike South

                          It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                          Comment

                          • _Richard_
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 30991

                            #14
                            Originally posted by mikesouth

                            How do they know it didn?t happen on set? was it a gay performer?

                            Where did APHSS get the idea that it didn?t happen on set? What do they base that on?

                            You probably know most of these answers as well as I do, apart from the fact there?s another HIV positive performer APHSS pulled the rest out of their ass.
                            so did you know the answers?

                            Comment

                            • Webmaster Advertising
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 1360

                              #15
                              So basically, condom only porn DOESNT protect adult performers from contracting HIV.

                              But surely AB332 being law should have prevented this from happening, I mean, wasn't that the whole reason behind passing this little law?

                              Comment

                              • Just Alex
                                Liv Benson to You, Bitch
                                • Aug 2007
                                • 6060

                                #16
                                Will be waiting.

                                Comment

                                • mikesouth
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jun 2003
                                  • 6334

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                  So basically, condom only porn DOESNT protect adult performers from contracting HIV.

                                  But surely AB332 being law should have prevented this from happening, I mean, wasn't that the whole reason behind passing this little law?
                                  I like how people in this biz use logic.

                                  he jumped out of an airplane and his parachute failed to open, therefor you dont need a parachute to safely jump out of a plane because it might not open anyway...WTF?
                                  Mike South

                                  It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                                  Comment

                                  • DWB
                                    Registered User
                                    • Jul 2003
                                    • 31779

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by _Richard_
                                    could very well have been a 'off the hook night' gone very wrong
                                    Indeed. One minute you're wearing a condom during a Manwin shoot, then four hours and a buzz later you're at a bareback breeding party, face down, ass up, with 30 strangers blowing loads in your ass. It could happen to anyone.

                                    Comment

                                    • RandyRandy
                                      Clips still sell!
                                      • Jul 2012
                                      • 1708

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                      So basically, condom only porn DOESNT protect adult performers from contracting HIV.

                                      But surely AB332 being law should have prevented this from happening, I mean, wasn't that the whole reason behind passing this little law?
                                      Condom only porn doesn't protect you if you don't use a condom off-set as well, everytime. Piriod!

                                      Comment

                                      • Webmaster Advertising
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • Sep 2003
                                        • 1360

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by RandyRandy
                                        Condom only porn doesn't protect you if you don't use a condom off-set as well, everytime. Piriod!
                                        Agreed but the whole 'merit' behind getting that law passed was because it would protect adult performers from contracting HIV.

                                        THAT is why the law got passed... Allegedly... Nothing to do with stifling the industry in Cali...

                                        Comment

                                        • mikesouth
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jun 2003
                                          • 6334

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                          Agreed but the whole 'merit' behind getting that law passed was because it would protect adult performers from contracting HIV.

                                          THAT is why the law got passed... Allegedly... Nothing to do with stifling the industry in Cali...
                                          And the flip is that they will say the reason he DIDNT infect anyone else is because men.com is condom only....Its a moot argument and a retarded one to try and put forth to discredit ab332
                                          Mike South

                                          It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                                          Comment

                                          • Webmaster Advertising
                                            So Fucking Banned
                                            • Sep 2003
                                            • 1360

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by mikesouth
                                            And the flip is that they will say the reason he DIDNT infect anyone else is because men.com is condom only....Its a moot argument and a retarded one to try and put forth to discredit ab332
                                            Not if it can be proven that his infection didn't happen on set.. Which it appears (so far) it is unlikely to have.

                                            Using condoms (or not) on set had nothing to do with this performer being found to be positive, it was the fact he was tested, which the vast majority of the industry has been doing for many, many years.

                                            How exactly did ab332 help protect this performer in this instance?

                                            Comment

                                            • mikesouth
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jun 2003
                                              • 6334

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                              Not if it can be proven that his infection didn't happen on set.. Which it appears (so far) it is unlikely to have.

                                              Using condoms (or not) on set had nothing to do with this performer being found to be positive, it was the fact he was tested, which the vast majority of the industry has been doing for many, many years.

                                              How exactly did ab332 help protect this performer in this instance?
                                              Please read my response again....it didnt protect HIM from HIMSELF but it can be argued that it DID protect everyone he worked with
                                              Mike South

                                              It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                                              Comment

                                              • Webmaster Advertising
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Sep 2003
                                                • 1360

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                Please read my response again....it didnt protect HIM from HIMSELF but it can be argued that it DID protect everyone he worked with
                                                I understand what you are saying.

                                                What *I* am saying is that the law got traction because people who voted on it were under the impression the performers were catching HIV from producing porn... We all know this isn't and hasn't been the case except for what 2 performers in the last... 10 years or so?

                                                Comment

                                                • DWB
                                                  Registered User
                                                  • Jul 2003
                                                  • 31779

                                                  #25
                                                  So... during a hardcore gay anal sex porn shoot, a condom never broke once? Sounds legit.

                                                  But I guess if everyone else tests negative then they can rule that out completely, unless someone has a false negative.

                                                  Mike, do you know if the performers (at risk) will do a few rounds of testing, or is it just one?

                                                  Comment

                                                  • EddyTheDog
                                                    Just Doing My Own Thing
                                                    • Jan 2011
                                                    • 25433

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                                    Not if it can be proven that his infection didn't happen on set.. Which it appears (so far) it is unlikely to have.

                                                    Using condoms (or not) on set had nothing to do with this performer being found to be positive, it was the fact he was tested, which the vast majority of the industry has been doing for many, many years.

                                                    How exactly did ab332 help protect this performer in this instance?
                                                    Condom use is encouraged because it is SAFER not SAFE...

                                                    Comment

                                                    • mikesouth
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jun 2003
                                                      • 6334

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by DWB
                                                      So... during a hardcore gay anal sex porn shoot, a condom never broke once? Sounds legit.

                                                      But I guess if everyone else tests negative then they can rule that out completely, unless someone has a false negative.

                                                      Mike, do you know if the performers (at risk) will do a few rounds of testing, or is it just one?
                                                      Honestly DWB this was a big deal till it came out it was the gay side...then it died down quickly. I dont know if he has been retested or not...I would presume that the Western Blot confirmed his status prior to them testing his partners, but we are talking about an arm of The FSC so who really knows...
                                                      Mike South

                                                      It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Webmaster Advertising
                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                        • Sep 2003
                                                        • 1360

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                        Honestly DWB this was a big deal till it came out it was the gay side...then it died down quickly.
                                                        Its cause the adult side of the business doesn't really care what happens on the gay side and vice versa... Sad but true...

                                                        Comment

                                                        • _Richard_
                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                          • Oct 2006
                                                          • 30991

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                          Honestly DWB this was a big deal till it came out it was the gay side...then it died down quickly. I dont know if he has been retested or not...I would presume that the Western Blot confirmed his status prior to them testing his partners, but we are talking about an arm of The FSC so who really knows...
                                                          forgive my ignorance here, but doesn't HIV take 6 months to show up?

                                                          Comment

                                                          • pornlaw
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Feb 2007
                                                            • 1902

                                                            #30
                                                            Here's what I find interesting...

                                                            from AVN... http://business.avn.com/articles/vid...TE-521362.html

                                                            4:25 p.m. update:

                                                            AVN received an official comment from Manwin: “Third-party producers creating content for Men.com have been requested to cease all production until further notice. Men.com will wait on the APHSS to confirm when production may resume.”

                                                            Manwin has distanced themselves from the director... now he/she is a third party producer... which in legalese means if someone caught HIV on set its not our problem go sue the "third party producer."
                                                            Michael

                                                            www.AdultBizLaw.com

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Webmaster Advertising
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • Sep 2003
                                                              • 1360

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by _Richard_
                                                              forgive my ignorance here, but doesn't HIV take 6 months to show up?
                                                              Apparently it takes 2-4 weeks...

                                                              http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...4004422AATmcJx

                                                              Comment

                                                              • epitome
                                                                So Fucking Lame
                                                                • Jun 2009
                                                                • 12156

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                                                Your first mistake was using Yahoo Answers.

                                                                Your second mistake was repeating what it says.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Grapesoda
                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                  • Jul 2003
                                                                  • 46238

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                                  Honestly DWB this was a big deal till it came out it was the gay side...then it died down quickly. I dont know if he has been retested or not...I would presume that the Western Blot confirmed his status prior to them testing his partners, but we are talking about an arm of The FSC so who really knows...
                                                                  uh Mike didn't all the hiv issues come from the gay side?... pretty sure they did. you can say getting fucked in the ass by trannys isn't gay but.... well you know .... just sayin...

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • mikesouth
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Jun 2003
                                                                    • 6334

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                                                    uh Mike didn't all the hiv issues come from the gay side?... pretty sure they did. you can say getting fucked in the ass by trannys isn't gay but.... well you know .... just sayin...
                                                                    For the most part you are correct but I do believe Darren james always held that he never was a "bottom" but who knows
                                                                    Mike South

                                                                    It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Due
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Mar 2001
                                                                      • 3620

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by pornlaw
                                                                      Here's what I find interesting...

                                                                      from AVN... http://business.avn.com/articles/vid...TE-521362.html

                                                                      4:25 p.m. update:

                                                                      AVN received an official comment from Manwin: ?Third-party producers creating content for Men.com have been requested to cease all production until further notice. Men.com will wait on the APHSS to confirm when production may resume.?

                                                                      Manwin has distanced themselves from the director... now he/she is a third party producer... which in legalese means if someone caught HIV on set its not our problem go sue the "third party producer."
                                                                      If I was shooting gay porn I would not do that from my main company, would you recommend that? It is very common to use payroll companies or production companies.
                                                                      I buy plugs
                                                                      Skype: Due_Global
                                                                      /Due

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Grapesoda
                                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                                        • Jul 2003
                                                                        • 46238

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                                        For the most part you are correct but I do believe Darren james always held that he never was a "bottom" but who knows
                                                                        only two guys know that for sure

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Trend
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • May 2008
                                                                          • 612

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                                                          So basically, condom only porn DOESNT protect adult performers from contracting HIV.

                                                                          But surely AB332 being law should have prevented this from happening, I mean, wasn't that the whole reason behind passing this little law?

                                                                          Sometimes it's almost too frustrating to read what's posted here at GFY.

                                                                          An adult performer has tested positive for HIV. This performer worked exclusively on condom only sets. As a precautionary measure, APHSS is providing retests for the small number of performers with which the infected individual had performed. All retests have come back negative and there is no indication that any transmission?including that of the positive performer?happened on set.

                                                                          As of this article....

                                                                          1. We do not know where this performer contracted HIV.

                                                                          2. We DO know that it did not spread from performer to performer on set.

                                                                          3. We DO know that testing identified it.


                                                                          Perhaps this performer contracted HIV from a non industry related partner. Regardless, at this point, this should be viewed as a win / win all the way around.

                                                                          In the gen pop, according to the CDC there were 47,500 reported new cases of HIV in 2010 and an estimated 1,148,200 persons aged 13 and older were living with HIV infection in the United States, including 207,600 (18.1%) persons whose infections had not been diagnosed.

                                                                          Source

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • pr0phet
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Jan 2005
                                                                            • 1041

                                                                            #38
                                                                            I thought most gay performers had HIV. So this guy is the only one?
                                                                            Pr0phet

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Webmaster Advertising
                                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                                              • Sep 2003
                                                                              • 1360

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by epitome
                                                                              Your first mistake was using Yahoo Answers.

                                                                              Your second mistake was repeating what it says.
                                                                              Maybe the CDC is a better source for the 2-4 week timeframe?

                                                                              http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/basic/

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • EddyTheDog
                                                                                Just Doing My Own Thing
                                                                                • Jan 2011
                                                                                • 25433

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                                                                Maybe the CDC is a better source for the 2-4 week timeframe?

                                                                                http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/basic/
                                                                                Most people will develop detectable antibodies that can be detected by the most commonly used tests in the United States within 2 to 8 weeks (the average is 25 days) of their infection. Ninety-seven percent (97%) of persons will develop detectable antibodies in the first 3 months. Even so, there is a small chance that some individuals will take longer to develop detectable antibodies. Therefore, a person should consider a follow-up test more than three months after their last potential exposure to HIV. In extremely rare cases, it can take up to 6 months to develop antibodies to HIV.
                                                                                You can not be sure for 6 months...

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • epitome
                                                                                  So Fucking Lame
                                                                                  • Jun 2009
                                                                                  • 12156

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by Webmaster Advertising
                                                                                  Maybe the CDC is a better source for the 2-4 week timeframe?

                                                                                  http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/basic/
                                                                                  Your third mistake was not reading the link.

                                                                                  Your fourth mistake was sticking with Yahoo Answers.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • DWB
                                                                                    Registered User
                                                                                    • Jul 2003
                                                                                    • 31779

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                                                                    uh Mike didn't all the hiv issues come from the gay side?... pretty sure they did. you can say getting fucked in the ass by trannys isn't gay but.... well you know .... just sayin...
                                                                                    I think people would be surprised to find out just how many guys secretly are either bi or into shemales and have sex with them regularly, especially guys in the sex industry. I'd wager at least 1/2 of the "straight" guys in the industry fall into this category. And I don't have any problems with that whatsoever, but I don't think people have an idea of just how high risk everyone really is.

                                                                                    Originally posted by pornlaw
                                                                                    Here's what I find interesting...

                                                                                    from AVN... http://business.avn.com/articles/vid...TE-521362.html

                                                                                    4:25 p.m. update:

                                                                                    AVN received an official comment from Manwin: ?Third-party producers creating content for Men.com have been requested to cease all production until further notice. Men.com will wait on the APHSS to confirm when production may resume.?

                                                                                    Manwin has distanced themselves from the director... now he/she is a third party producer... which in legalese means if someone caught HIV on set its not our problem go sue the "third party producer."
                                                                                    Rogue gay producers.

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • jack-exploitedbabysitters
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Mar 2012
                                                                                      • 176

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by DWB
                                                                                      Indeed. One minute you're wearing a condom during a Manwin shoot, then four hours and a buzz later you're at a bareback breeding party, face down, ass up, with 30 strangers blowing loads in your ass. It could happen to anyone.
                                                                                      hahhahaha

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Aidoru
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Jul 2012
                                                                                        • 655

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        HIV is not good.
                                                                                        Gravurecash - 50% Lifetime RevShare on all signups and rebills, 5% Webmaster Referral

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • NemesisEnforcer
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Aug 2003
                                                                                          • 2122

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by DWB
                                                                                          I think people would be surprised to find out just how many guys secretly are either bi or into shemales and have sex with them regularly, especially guys in the sex industry. I'd wager at least 1/2 of the "straight" guys in the industry fall into this category. And I don't have any problems with that whatsoever, but I don't think people have an idea of just how high risk everyone really is.
                                                                                          Actually, that's common knowledge. Like herpes, we don't talk about it.
                                                                                          The Only Time When Success Comes Before Work Is In A Dictionary.

                                                                                          Did you ever notice: When you put the 2 words 'The' and 'IRS' together it spells 'Theirs.'

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • xxxjay
                                                                                            Tube groupie.
                                                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                                                            • 13482

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Gay performer, shoot was for men.com...end of story.
                                                                                            http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Grapesoda
                                                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                                                              • Jul 2003
                                                                                              • 46238

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by xxxjay
                                                                                              Gay performer, shoot was for men.com...end of story.
                                                                                              but we need to be punished for homosexuality Jay

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • xxxjay
                                                                                                Tube groupie.
                                                                                                • Aug 2002
                                                                                                • 13482

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                                                                                but we need to be punished for homosexuality Jay
                                                                                                I wasn't even suggesting that.

                                                                                                Anytime ANYONE gets HIV it sucks.

                                                                                                http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • DWB
                                                                                                  Registered User
                                                                                                  • Jul 2003
                                                                                                  • 31779

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Originally posted by NemesisEnforcer
                                                                                                  Actually, that's common knowledge. Like herpes, we don't talk about it.
                                                                                                  People think they know, but I don't they really know.

                                                                                                  Either way, you know enough to know you're dealing with mostly switch hitters and the fact that everyone is OK with that pretty much says everything about the industry that needs to be said.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • nikki99
                                                                                                    Supermodel
                                                                                                    • Nov 2004
                                                                                                    • 23087

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    I see more bareback content than ever these days, nobody fucking cares
                                                                                                    SMC Revenue - Best Tgirl websites of the world now VR
                                                                                                    Non exclusive BIG Tranny/shemale Package for sale, full 2257 - hit me up skype: nikkimontero

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...