Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Enough
The site I used to test has traffic from several sources, but most of it comes from Google.
The test was made on the same site, ~15 days through pop under and ~15 days through banners.
I don't believe I'm comparing oranges to apples. Live cams is live cams, maybe the way to sign up or to pay is different, but this is a reason for me to test them all, so I can discover which one works better.
Conversion for me is the proportion of levels: Visits on my site to clicks to the affiliate site, visits coming from those clicks on my site to free member sign up, and finally free to paid members.
I don't know why but I forgot to test webcams.com! Sorry. Actually, I think I never promoted this site. Maybe I should.
I only worked (and work) with revenue share these days.
The site has about 5k visits / day, but the number of clicks-visits to the programs is lower and it varies from day to day, from site to site.
In addition, YEAH, I'm concerned about fraud, but since I'm not a clairvoyant I guess I will have to trust, and believe that the owners are honest.
The only way to get rid of this kind of fraud is to have my own sites.
|
Firstly, the "they all shave" is a baseless and unproven accusation that is completely without any merit other than the "feelings" of the posters sharing that sentiment, so you should take those comments with a grain of salt. Until someone proves that they shave then that is all just the vitriol of people that believe they should be making more but are not.
I am not a cam company and have no direct stake in any of them other than the traffic we send. We test them all, except Chaturbate but we will test them too. We do the best with streamrate, but VS is a close second.
