no i read it in a magazine a month ago, and the number slipped my memory and didnt bother to count it up when making this thread. I have already apologised
the point is to make you go wow at these families achievements.
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
wow who pissed in your cherios? looks as though your becoming a hater stuartd.
A hater? Cause you didn't like the question?
It's a valid question. You have started a lot of "FACT:" threads despite not stating any facts. I just want to know why. What do you get out of it?
A hater? Cause you didn't like the question?
It's a valid question. You have started a lot of "FACT:" threads despite not stating any facts. I just want to know why. What do you get out of it?
Arguing with you is like arguing with a lesbian 44 year old who has it in for men
what am i after with my fact threads? a debate, now gfy.
no but I am a retard. my memory is not amazing with numbers.
as to your second point, that was the purpose of the thread, rather than the exact numbers.
Um FACTS typically have something to do with EXACT NUMBERS.
"He threw a lot of TDs this season". Not really a fact. More of an opinion
"He threw 35 TDs this season". That's a FACT.
"He threw 35 TDs this season, that's a lot of TDs". A FACT followed by an opinion.
"He threw for 37 TDs this season"( when he actually threw 35 ) NOT a FACT.
Um FACTS typically have something to do with EXACT NUMBERS.
"He threw a lot of TDs this season". Not really a fact. More of an opinion
"He threw 35 TDs this season". That's a FACT.
"He threw 35 TDs this season, that's a lot of TDs". A FACT followed by an opinion.
"He threw for 37 TDs this season"( when he actually threw 35 ) NOT a FACT.
You come here for a debate? And you think you'll get much of a debate by starting each thread with "FACT:" and then being wrong in your first post?
Your debates won't last very long.
you always have to have the last word stuartd and after this post i will let you have it, because that type of thing satisfies you. I sure as hell wouldnt like to live with you and feel sorry for those who do.
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
Well technically it would of been:
4 years of Sr. Bush & Barbara
8 years of Bill Clinton & Hillary
8 years of Bush version 2.
Then if Hillary wins just 1 term thats another 4 years.
Which seems like it would be 24 but he did say the Clintons & the Bushes so in effect we have had
24 years of Bush's (remember there is hubby and wives at same time)
16 current years of the Clintons with an additional 8 years on one term making that also 24, and if she won a second term it would be 28.
So in real world answers the correct answer could also be 48 years.
Comment