View Single Post
Old 06-26-2003, 08:32 AM  
notjoe
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,599
Quote:
Originally posted by AlanM
You are wrong!

The first:
"The coded video rate is limited to 1.862 Mbit/sec." If you will go further at the same bit rates MPEG-2 quality will be much better, so as I already said it is totally useless to make higher resolution in MPEG-1 streams.

The second:
Sorenson is based on MPEG-4 technology and mostly aimed for QuickTime encoding, not for MPEG-1.

And the last thing:
I was asking about the possibility to buy DVD MPEG-2 (MPEG-4) quality videos at the price of MPEG-1. So as I see nobody is interested in it.

It looks like you are totally newbie to video encoding

1) You're confused my son. The ONLY reason anyone uses mpeg-1 anymore isnt because of its amazing quality or impressive compression but because that it is the most widely supported format on the net.

The only advantage to mpeg-2 for what you're doing is giving people who wish to re-encode their own shit a decent copy to work with but when it comes to end-user support, forget it.

2) Sorenson does/can compress Mpeg-1 compatiable files which are still just as widely supported and isnt solely based on Mpeg-4, maybe you're thinking of Sorenson v3.

For the most part an mpeg compressor is a mpeg compressor but some programs tend to do it better. Oh, and yes you can go over 352x240, but i dont see how that is useless.
notjoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote