Me upset? How does a thread about having fun to see you idiots cry result in me heing upset exactly :orglaugh
You still sound very upset and frustrated
Me upset? How does a thread about having fun to see you idiots cry result in me heing upset exactly :orglaugh
You still sound very upset and frustrated
Any moron can see you're attempt at using humor to deflect your anger on the subject. I haven't said whether I agree or disagree with guns. I just stated you clearly are an idiot who doesn't understand the US Constitution.
But continue with your desperate troll attempt... I didn't mean to interject and confuse you. In fact, I could give two fucks what people who call others pussies because they own guns think. Especially considering these 'pussies' will most likely be the ones ransacking your shit as you sit in the corner screaming 'please, not grandma's vase' as your house is ransacked. With, or without a gun....
Any moron can see you're attempt at using humor to deflect your anger on the subject. I haven't said whether I agree or disagree with guns. I just stated you clearly are an idiot who doesn't understand the US Constitution.
But continue with your desperate troll attempt... I didn't mean to interject and confuse you. In fact, I could give two fucks what people who call others pussies because they own guns think. Especially considering these 'pussies' will most likely be the ones ransacking your shit as you sit in the corner screaming 'please, not grandma's vase' as your house is ransacked. With, or without a gun....
It's even more comical for 'gun nuts' to see people make posts like this because they don't understand history, or the US Constitution.
The ultimate NRA creation.
Obama gave you commie healthcare now he is going to take you guns.
Whats your delightful little saying ? Something about your "cold dead hands".
I prefer this quote from your fag poster boi Mr Heston "gun-toting, knuckle-dragging, bloodthirsty maniacs".
Go Obama - "change you can really believe in !!!"
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
It's even more comical for 'gun nuts' to see people make posts like this because they don't understand history, or the US Constitution.
Funny how right wingers hide behind the constitution when it comes to the 2nd Amendment and guns but hate it and want to change it when it comes to the 14th Amendment and citizenship.
Funny how right wingers hide behind the constitution when it comes to the 2nd Amendment and guns but hate it and want to change it when it comes to the 14th Amendment and citizenship.
People who get their ideas of America from an adult message board or at least it seems cause you think we are all fat people with ten guns. I have never lived in a big city in my life. I have never seen a gun in my life other then a cop holding one and there are so many banging hot girls around here one could never tire of it and go for a fatty LOL. Sure live in Chicago or whatever but guns are not what they make it seem. It never crosses my mind that there is a gun around the corner. Yeah I could go and get a gun if needed but people are not walking around with them scratching their asses like it is a glove
Our site is coming soon. It will be one of the best ever! I know so. Brian and Penny
Correct me if im wrong but Franck how are you going to give advise on guns.. didn't your country surrender like little bitches in ww2 and in fact needed the help of other countries guns to save your sorry asses?
Funny how right wingers hide behind the constitution when it comes to the 2nd Amendment and guns but hate it and want to change it when it comes to the 14th Amendment and citizenship.
Because the supreme court has ruled the 2nd is a fundamental right... just like the 1st... the 4th 5th and 6th are not fundamental much less the 14th...
look im a gun nutt... by all aspects but ill be the first to say that half of gun owners should not own guns... I think yearly classes and qualifications should be a must...
I don't care what type of weapon you own because they all will kill... but I think you should have to show proficiency with said weapons yearly.... Me personally for sure 100% I am more qualified to handle a weapon than 99.9% of any officer on the streets... so why is it fair I should have to depend on a less qualified person to defend me?
Correct me if im wrong but Franck how are you going to give advise on guns.. didn't your country surrender like little bitches in ww2 and in fact needed the help of other countries guns to save your sorry asses?
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." George Washington
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
Far from a gun nut but I would stand up to fight for my rights almost any day of the week.
Tuesdays are just out of the question...
I own one gun. I do not worry about gun bans. I do not worry about someone breaking in. However, It's here in case. WHy? Because its my right.
Does my possession of a firearm encourage a a criminal to have and use a gun? no. Does my possession of a firearm discourage a criminal from breaking into my house? I would sure hope so if they knew I had it.
Do I hope to ever shoot someone? Absolutely not.
I am with Danza as far as gun owners needing annual check ups. However I wouldnt bash the dutch for a damn thing as they are the ones that offered a significant leg up when America was first forming and virtually gave us the right to make and keep the constitution that we have today. They kick started our currency. Money is more powerful than guns.
look im a gun nutt... by all aspects but ill be the first to say that half of gun owners should not own guns... I think yearly classes and qualifications should be a must...
I don't care what type of weapon you own because they all will kill... but I think you should have to show proficiency with said weapons yearly.... Me personally for sure 100% I am more qualified to handle a weapon than 99.9% of any officer on the streets... so why is it fair I should have to depend on a less qualified person to defend me?
I dont think banning but I think classes and qualifications should be a must. There is great responsibility in owning a firearm and its taken pretty lightly.
Because the supreme court has ruled the 2nd is a fundamental right... just like the 1st... the 4th 5th and 6th are not fundamental much less the 14th...
look im a gun nutt... by all aspects but ill be the first to say that half of gun owners should not own guns... I think yearly classes and qualifications should be a must...
I don't care what type of weapon you own because they all will kill... but I think you should have to show proficiency with said weapons yearly.... Me personally for sure 100% I am more qualified to handle a weapon than 99.9% of any officer on the streets... so why is it fair I should have to depend on a less qualified person to defend me?
Which most pro gun control people agree with. Unfortunately its easy as fuck to get guns legally
Dude, there's nothing to be gained from intentionally antagonizing them. You never know when one of them will snap and spray their local mall food court with bullets or something. They're powder kegs.
I just stated you clearly are an idiot who doesn't understand the US Constitution.
You have the right to bear arms. You do not have the right to a rocket launcher or a missile silo. You - we - do no have the right to bear an assault rifle.
Anyone can get firearms, and the more firearms we hand out the more likely the chance they will get into the hands of criminals or people with mental health issues. This will happen again, and more laws will be passed. The longer this goes on, the more people will be killed, the louder this issue will get, and the more our rights will be taken away.
The 2nd amendment is just that - an amendment - and it can be changed.
no... the arms are not specific .. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
which is why it will never be changed you can say it can be changed as much as you want and it can't the supreme court ruled it fundamental ... the whole reason it was put into place was for a gov to not take it away or change it.. and if they try we the people can take our freedom back....
I literally just had lunch with a con law professor 2 days ago.. I picked his brain beyond picking..... the 1st and 2nd are the most precious things we have in the constitution hell the 1st gives us the right to speak how we are speaking now... next you will say they can take that away....
Originally posted by Rochard
You have the right to bear arms. You do not have the right to a rocket launcher or a missile silo. You - we - do no have the right to bear an assault rifle.
Anyone can get firearms, and the more firearms we hand out the more likely the chance they will get into the hands of criminals or people with mental health issues. This will happen again, and more laws will be passed. The longer this goes on, the more people will be killed, the louder this issue will get, and the more our rights will be taken away.
The 2nd amendment is just that - an amendment - and it can be changed.
You have the right to bear arms. You do not have the right to a rocket launcher or a missile silo. You - we - do no have the right to bear an assault rifle.
Anyone can get firearms, and the more firearms we hand out the more likely the chance they will get into the hands of criminals or people with mental health issues. This will happen again, and more laws will be passed. The longer this goes on, the more people will be killed, the louder this issue will get, and the more our rights will be taken away.
The 2nd amendment is just that - an amendment - and it can be changed.
Both of those guns fire the same round, and will do so every time the trigger is pulled. One looks different than the other. Should a weapon be banned because some people find it scary?
no... the arms are not specific .. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
which is why it will never be changed you can say it can be changed as much as you want and it can't the supreme court ruled it fundamental ... the whole reason it was put into place was for a gov to not take it away or change it.. and if they try we the people can take our freedom back....
I literally just had lunch with a con law professor 2 days ago.. I picked his brain beyond picking..... the 1st and 2nd are the most precious things we have in the constitution hell the 1st gives us the right to speak how we are speaking now... next you will say they can take that away....
"well regulated" if that part was followed there would be no problem.
"well regulated" if that part was followed there would be no problem.
there lies the problem... whats well regulated whats not.... furthermore your idea of militia is different from mine... (i.e.) why it's a fundamental right for americans.... the min the GOV says your not regulated then they are the ones not regulated... it's a catch 22..
Curious as to why you couldn't just say "my gun" - instead of the minutia specifics of the make and model.
Reads like a gun nerd pissing contest.
Can you honestly deny that you're NOT waiting for someone to ask you what gear you use when you get that "wow" photo? I don't think you can honestly say you're not eager to share the equipment used, lighting conditions, etc. This isn't much different.
Can you honestly deny that you're NOT waiting for someone to ask you what gear you use when you get that "wow" photo? I don't think you can honestly say you're not eager to share the equipment used, lighting conditions, etc. This isn't much different.
To the contrary - I actually dislike when people ask what gear I used. It's a superficial question that has little to do with appreciation of the photo itself.
Put the same gear in the hands of someone else isn't going to produce the same results - the same can be said of guns.
To the contrary - I actually dislike when people ask what gear I used. It's a superficial question that has little to do with appreciation of the photo itself.
Put the same gear in the hands of someone else isn't going to produce the same results - the same can be said of guns.
That's a nice answer. But you and I both know that, if true, it is the exception. Most photographers are eager to discuss their equipment, what shutter speed, F-stop, etc. Which is why nearly every photography-related magazine on the planet shares such information.
..... I busted out laughing reading that. You're a talentless fucking board whore. I looked at your content and could not stop laughing actually. You should sell it with a bottle of mescal and generic suicide notes.
It's been years since I've seen his work, but from what I remember it used to be pretty good. It wasn't for everybody, though. So maybe he got a lot worse in the last 6 years, or perhaps it's just not something you enjoy?
That's a nice answer. But you and I both know that, if true, it is the exception. Most photographers are eager to discuss their equipment, what shutter speed, F-stop, etc. Which is why nearly every photography-related magazine on the planet shares such information.
Guess that makes me unlike most other photographers. I think too many photographers talk specs and techie jargon ad nauseum...instead of simply demonstrating what they can do.
I just prefer to do - let the images speak for themselves.
..... I busted out laughing reading that. You're a talentless fucking board whore. I looked at your content and could not stop laughing actually. You should sell it with a bottle of mescal and generic suicide notes.
Yet another bit of drivel from an insignificant pissant troll who's only pitiful talent is demonstrating to the world what an uneducated, moronic jackass he is.
you mad bro? Seriously. I looked at that shit and started laughing. You're a fucking clown and I'd be willing to bet broke. You should actually kill yourself for being a failure.
It must suck to look at yourself in the mirror at the end of the day and say, "I did some really good trolling today."
How sad is that?
You're not self-aware enough or capable of comprehending your personna non grata status. You're universally regarded on this forum as an insignificant nothing who dispenses incessant negativity and vile hatred with all the vocabulary, intellect and attitude of a 5th-grader.
Many of us would be challenged to point to a single constructive, insightful or useful post you've contributed. Your contemptible existence on GFY is nothing more than that of a low-brow, trolling agitator who gets his pathetic jollies inciting others.
no... the arms are not specific .. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
which is why it will never be changed you can say it can be changed as much as you want and it can't the supreme court ruled it fundamental ... the whole reason it was put into place was for a gov to not take it away or change it.. and if they try we the people can take our freedom back....
I literally just had lunch with a con law professor 2 days ago.. I picked his brain beyond picking..... the 1st and 2nd are the most precious things we have in the constitution hell the 1st gives us the right to speak how we are speaking now... next you will say they can take that away....
So what your saying is I have my assault rifle - and missiles too?
Comment