Washington Post: TMM/NATS - User Data Stolen From Pornographic Web Sites

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • minusonebit
    So Fucking Banned
    • Feb 2006
    • 7391

    #1

    Washington Post: TMM/NATS - User Data Stolen From Pornographic Web Sites

    User Data Stolen From Pornographic Web Sites
    Hackers Apparently Were After E-Mail Addresses for Spam, Not Credit Card Information

    By Keith B. Richburg
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Friday, January 4, 2008; Page A09

    NEW YORK -- Consumers of Internet pornography who secretly signed up for memberships on adult-oriented Web sites in the past few months may be in for a shock -- some of their personal information, including e-mail addresses, may have been compromised by a security breach.

    Though the breach, which potentially could affect tens of thousands of customers, reportedly did not involve the theft of credit card information, it could nonetheless have a significant impact on the lucrative Internet pornography industry, according to those who monitor the market. These observers note that online porn relies, as much as anything else, on the promise that its customers can enjoy complete anonymity as they indulge their favorite niche pastimes from the privacy of their own computers.

    "It's a huge concern," said Jason Tucker, whose Falcon Foto company boasts one of the world's largest erotic libraries. "The relationship we have with our customers is based on trust. The industry's concern is if that trust has been violated, we could see a drop-off in customers."

    More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...010303549.html
  • candyflip
    Carpe Visio
    • Jul 2002
    • 43073

    #2
    What did you sig say?

    Spend you some brain.
    Email Me

    Comment

    • seeric
      ..........
      • Aug 2004
      • 41917

      #3
      ohboy. dude what do you do during the day? you're obviously working somewhere based on your gfy pattern.

      Comment

      • minusonebit
        So Fucking Banned
        • Feb 2006
        • 7391

        #4
        Originally posted by candyflip
        What did you sig say?
        It had links to all of the threads about TMM/NATS and John, with a message encouraging thier boycott. The admins apparently saw fit to censor it and therefore me. Which is fine, I will leave it like that, with a small edit.

        Comment

        • Dirty F
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jul 2001
          • 59204

          #5
          Minusonebit's confirmed mental illness.

          Comment

          • commonsense
            So Fucking Banned
            • Feb 2007
            • 1790

            #6
            Your obsession with TMM is just plain sad. No new information in the "news" article, and there's that same Tucker quote again.

            Comment

            • cykoe6
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2005
              • 4499

              #7
              Congrats on your seemingly successful campaign to discredit and harm the industry in which most of us work (except you)
              бабки, шлюхи, сила

              Comment

              • Dirty F
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Jul 2001
                • 59204

                #8
                Originally posted by commonsense
                Your obsession with TMM is just plain sad. No new information in the "news" article, and there's that same Tucker quote again.
                It has nothing to do with tmm, it could be anything as long as he gets attention.

                Once again:
                Originally posted by Dirty F

                Comment

                • TheSenator
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 13330

                  #9
                  Originally posted by candyflip
                  What did you sig say?
                  Yeah....where did those threads go in your sig???

                  I was showing my other webmaster buddy who also spreads his eggs like I do.

                  Sad day for GFY.
                  ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                  Comment

                  • minusonebit
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 7391

                    #10
                    That link might work better... skip the ads.

                    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...303549_pf.html

                    Comment

                    • Dirty F
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jul 2001
                      • 59204

                      #11
                      Originally posted by minusonebit
                      That link might work better... skip the ads.

                      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...303549_pf.html
                      You are sick Keith. Very sick in your brain.

                      Comment

                      • minusonebit
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Feb 2006
                        • 7391

                        #12
                        Originally posted by TheSenator
                        Yeah....where did those threads go in your sig???

                        I was showing my other webmaster buddy who also spreads his eggs like I do.

                        Sad day for GFY.
                        I think the threads are still there. Apparently, me linking to them is an act of "personal attack". Whatever, their site, their sandbox, their rules. Sad that we have to resort to censorship on an adult-industry site, the same industry that is the very first to cry (and rightfully so) about free speech when someone tries to remove such a site.

                        Comment

                        • RP Fade
                          Confirmed User
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 3343

                          #13
                          maybe this will make the cover of Time or Newsweek..
                          HomemadeCash.com - Homemade & GF sites powered by NScash.com
                          HomemadeVideoPass.com - The only all homemade mega site
                          OurHomemadePorno.com - Real couples fucking on camera
                          Contact ICQ: 400-786-531 Email: fade AT nscash.com

                          Comment

                          • TheSenator
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 13330

                            #14
                            Originally posted by minusonebit
                            I think the threads are still there. Apparently, me linking to them is an act of "personal attack". Whatever, their site, their sandbox, their rules. Sad that we have to resort to censorship on an adult-industry site, the same industry that is the very first to cry (and rightfully so) about free speech when someone tries to remove such a site.

                            This board is owned by PlayBoy?.
                            ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                            Comment

                            • minusonebit
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Feb 2006
                              • 7391

                              #15
                              And around she goes... one place picked it up already, probably past deadlines for most papers, so it will get picked up for Saturday...

                              http://freeinternetpress.com/story.php?sid=14829

                              Comment

                              • Paul Markham
                                Too old to care
                                • Jun 2001
                                • 52942

                                #16
                                Originally posted by cykoe6
                                Congrats on your seemingly successful campaign to discredit and harm the industry in which most of us work (except you)
                                don't blame him, it's not his fault this started, he might of fanned the flames. The blame lies solely on the shoulders of John Albright.

                                He ran a program that at best had leaks.
                                He denied it could be his program to blame.
                                It could of even been an inside job.
                                He tried to cover it up with legal threats of a C&D.
                                He never checked the system properly when it was so obvious it was compromised he had to look into it.

                                I understand the reason many are sticking their heads in the sand and diverting the attention from the person who is to blame for this to a little person. But are they also partly to blame for this? Programs who knew there was a problem and decided to keep quiet?

                                As for the GFY admin, this board is full of personal attacks, why make m1b a target?



                                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                Comment

                                • Holly
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Jun 2003
                                  • 10017

                                  #17
                                  How the hell do they know that they "secretly" signed up??

                                  I'm sure a lot of people don't give a fuck if anyone knows they look at porn. Not everyone is hiding it from their boss and wife.
                                  War National Damn Champions Eagle

                                  Comment

                                  • V_RocKs
                                    Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                                    • Nov 2003
                                    • 32451

                                    #18
                                    The breach was first reported on the blog In Corruption We Trust, by Keith Kimmel, who has two adult Web sites and uses the software.
                                    IF I was Playboy I would sue the Post and Keith for not acknowledging that the first report was HERE at GFY!

                                    Comment

                                    • pip
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Nov 2005
                                      • 468

                                      #19
                                      Keith did you goto College?

                                      "Bondage and Stuff?"

                                      Comment

                                      • Iron Fist
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Dec 2006
                                        • 23400

                                        #20
                                        Strangely this crusade is kinda pointless... how would a surfer really know what NATS is in the first place? I mean check the join forms... I don't usually see a reference to NATs anywhere on the page.. however I do see references to billers and such... so. would it affect sales? Not really...
                                        i like waffles

                                        Comment

                                        • RomaCash
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Dec 2007
                                          • 213

                                          #21
                                          its crap, because we wanted to buy it for our affiliate program.
                                          Now I'm not sure.
                                          PORNUPLOAD.COM Free Traffic &
                                          Easy $$$money$$$ making service!

                                          Comment

                                          • tony299
                                            lurker
                                            • Aug 2002
                                            • 57021

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                            don't blame him, it's not his fault this started, he might of fanned the flames. The blame lies solely on the shoulders of John Albright.

                                            He ran a program that at best had leaks.
                                            He denied it could be his program to blame.
                                            It could of even been an inside job.
                                            He tried to cover it up with legal threats of a C&D.
                                            He never checked the system properly when it was so obvious it was compromised he had to look into it.

                                            I understand the reason many are sticking their heads in the sand and diverting the attention from the person who is to blame for this to a little person. But are they also partly to blame for this? Programs who knew there was a problem and decided to keep quiet?

                                            As for the GFY admin, this board is full of personal attacks, why make m1b a target?
                                            Well said Paul.

                                            Comment

                                            Working...