MinusOneBit Announces Possible Trademark Lawsuit
Collapse
X
-
With all due respect, sir, you are talking about one of the top litigators in Ohio, if not the United States of America. Your own credentials include only a law degree. Please mind your place in things.I dont know enough of the facts to say whether he has good shot or not. And I'm not really looking to give him legal advice, but the general advice I can give is that if you want to protect your name, file for a federal trademark. Don't try to stand on common law state trademark rights.
The key to a federal trademark is knowing how to write the description. Your trademark is only as strong as the description.
.Comment
-
And who might be one of the top litigators in Ohio if not the entire United States that I am indirectly insulting with my posts ?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Minusonebit, of course. I mean he lost his own criminal trespass case, but other than that he counts himself in the top 5 litigators in his state.
I hope you caught the sarcasm in my message. Sometime it's missed in writing..Comment
-
I thought you referring to him. The Vegas address in his original post threw me off though.Comment
-
This thread will never die.No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
-- Learned Hand
http://www.bjpenn.comComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
If you're going to file a claim with the courts at least take the time to PROOFREAD the damn thing first.
"under taken" is one word, idiot.
undertaken -- http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/undertaken
This lax attitude about spelling and diction and typos etc may fly on the interweb but I can assure you court documents need to be precise or you end up looking more retarded than people first thought.Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
Trust me, the occasional typo is not going to sink a case. I see them in briefs written by supposedly the best of the best all the time. And not something that irrelevant, either.If you're going to file a claim with the courts at least take the time to PROOFREAD the damn thing first.
"under taken" is one word, idiot.
undertaken -- http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/undertaken
This lax attitude about spelling and diction and typos etc may fly on the interweb but I can assure you court documents need to be precise or you end up looking more retarded than people first thought.Comment
-
what about when they find out your are a thief ?
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=795095Comment
-
Legally, Minusonebit is correct.
Trademarks do NOT have to be registered.
A common law trademark can be enforced in federal court. However, proof that the mark has achieved "secondary meaning" is not presumed, the burden of proof shifts to the alleged trademark owner. In contrast, in cases where there is a registered trademark, secondary meaning is presumed upon registration.
In this case, it might not be hard to show bad faith on the part of the alleged infringer.
So, in my layperson opinion, I think the case could proceed. It is not farfetched.Comment


AIM: GrouchyGfy

Comment