Romney threatens Adult industry

anyone that votes for the leader of their country based on who might be best for porn is a fucking retard.

haha - I was honestly thinking that as I read that post!

Still, tho, vote for freedom of expression and speech, and for one that doesn't bring religion into the political equation and the porn will be fine.

What will be funny is if Romney wins the Republican nomination and the retarded Democrats nominate Obama.

There's are a large portion of the 80% of Americans who define themelves as being religious that will not vote for a black man, especially over a preacher man.

according to many here, if Bush had said "I support porn" - he would then be the best president ever. because afterall, who cares about war, global relations, international trade defecits, terrorism, taxes, inflation, crashing currency and all the other "little issues" that shouldn't influence a decision. porn. porn is where the future is. porn will bring our kids into the next century. porn will make the world safer and the economy thrive.

This is critical, the elections for the Republican nomination are only weeks away, folks can influence the outcome and ensure the eventual nominee is someone who understands the constitution and freedoms, Gov. Romney CLEARLY doesn't and is nakedly pandering to "social conservatives" like Mike Huckabee.

MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD!

Stop Romney in his tracks!

Support grassroots advertisements for Ron Paul in Nevada!
http://www.operationnh.com/

Donate to the official campaign:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

Register Republican in your state and support Ron Paul

BS PP, having candidates in either party that understand the constitution and freedom is important especially when you can influence the process and people still have time !

Nevada will be one of the key primary battlegrounds after Iowa and New Hampshire, support grassroots TV ads for Ron Paul in Nevada:


http://www.operationnh.com/

spread the message, donate to the official campaign, support him in your state primary and vote against the social neocons or you may eventually end up with someone worse than Bush, a big spending, war mongering monster

no one is getting elected for president based on their "understanding of the Constitution"

sorry.

thanks for playing "I Suck at Politics"

really? Bush?

you mean Democrats didn't play a roll in anything he's done?

Hillary didn't vote to go into Iraq and didn't say continually that she supported the War?

"big spending"? you mean Bush can spend money? How does the President get this money? Who approves it?

Do you actually watch the news? or do you just invent the news?




they are all assholes tied to various interests. politics has as much to do with "the constitution" as donny long does with "great photography"

the logic is to influence the process and keep the social fanatical neocons out because the only interests they serve are their own special interests and their "base" of thoroughly dislikable supporters who will happily ride roughshod over your rights

EXACTLY, i'm not shilling for the other side, they're just as bad as well

there is one man who can't be bought, who doesn't pander, has a record of strickly adhering to the constitution and is entirely funded by grassroots not special interests who don't give him money because they can't influence him, his name is Ron Paul and that's why he deserve's our support.

http://ronpaul2008.com/

anyone who votes for a religious fundamentalist who wants to put them in jail is far worse than a retard.

Yes, Bush is SOOOOO good on these other issues. Like civil liberties and the economy. A real miracle worker, this guy.

You mean Bush didn't lie and say they had concrete intelligence that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction to influence the congressional vote? You mean that congress actually was stupid enough to PASS A BUDGET and keep the country running even though they didn't like the President?

You don't know anything about politics. You don't know anything about political history. You don't understand how a government functions. You're not stupid, I don't think, but you are totally ignorant and like most conservatives you view education - even of yourself - as a threat. You need to learn something or STFU.

Like Clinton or Obama?

Oh boy ... here comes the Paultards.

"He stands for truth, liberty, justice and the american way cliche cliche cliche cliche noun verb adjective noun cliche cliche" - Typical Ron Paul supporter sentence.

I highly doubt Romney will win. Christians won't vote for a Mormon. Of course the are going to say all this shit to get elected. Who knows what will really be done when elected.

But Warchild, there is a large percentage of blacks in America and they will vote for Obama, along with a majority of whites and dems, he could win, hopefully.

If it's not sarcasm I'm detecting...

I figured someone of your age would follow politics a little bit closer. Obama doesn't even belong in the same sentence as Clinton when it comes to war mongering and big spending.

Do you really believe that?

LOL thats your problem. Stop sucking main stream medias dick before your standing in line asking for bread.

You really need to educate yourself and please leave this board. You make adult webmasters seem very simple minded.

Sorry, guess I should have cropped the post more . . . I meant "worse than Bush."

Ron Paul is against Net Neutrality you fucking Moron. Thats the exact opposite of keeping "Internet Alive"

Paultards...That describes his supporters perfectly.

BTW Romney is a bigger piece of shit than Bush.

Please fill us in on what you think this country stands for. I served six years for our country and your talk of cliches makes me

Clinton voted for the war and says she doesn't want the troops out for YEARS

Obama would do the same in addition he threatens Iran and other countries with nuclear first strike options. the man is INSANE like the frothing neocon filth

All of the Paultards will completely ignore the fact that Ron Paul voted against Net Neutrality even though I put it in huge red font.

uhm... dunno what to say here except EXACTLY, thanks for helping me make my point.

here's what a DC lobbyist says about Ron Paul:

-------
AB SMITH is a Washington Lobbyist, his firm has been working in Washington for nearly 30 years. When asked during the interview why are many of the Washington Insiders not happy with Ron Paul, his answers were at first standard, then came the dirty stuff. It was worth every minute on the phone with him to get the real story.

Political Opinions: How long have you been working in Washington?

AB SMITH: A long time, nearly 30 years in this field. Most of our clients tend to be tech clients, but I do consider ourselves one of the top 15 firms in terms of getting things done in Washington in this area.

Political Opinions: What do you think about Ron Paul?

AB SMITH: That?s a loaded question, I think his campaign is highly efficient in terms of money collected vs money spent.

Political Opinions: You?ve been in Washington a long time, you even start to sound like those guys (laugh) common tell me what you think about Ron Paul, not just the dance around answer.

AB SMITH: (laugh) Look, Ron Paul is a problem for a bunch of us. It?s not that he doesn?t take the money, his campaign pretty stated that he will take money from everyone, but he doesn?t care why you donate? he takes the money and pretty much stated ?if you are too stupid to know what I stand for, then you deserve to have your money taken from your pocket?

Political Opinions: How does the process work in your industry.

AB SMITH: You agree that my name isn?t going to be on article?

Political Opinions: Yep? it?s agreed? if I published.. I would never get another story from you again.. so it?s in both our interests.

AB SMITH: Put it this way, legally, I could donate an unlimited amount of money to anyone I want. I will give you a generic example, a law is in the process of taxing computers. Some environmental group is stating that the additional costs of recycling a computer is costly and that the people buying them should pay a 10% additional tax to cover the costs. They hired a lobbyist firm to make their cause and now there is a percentage of congress that is on board with this. Now we got tech firms calling us right and left (in this example). The problem is the law states that I can only donate a $5,000 or so per company. IE: The company can only donate $5,000 to a politician. But the system is so freaking backwards that when something like a tax on computers show up in congress that I could spend huge amounts of money for my lobby effort. In this example, I want to stress that this isn?t happening.. it?s just an example of how much money I could gather in about 8 hours if I needed it for this or that effort. In this case, I would just inform a counterpart of this problem, and they would address their client? within a day I start the ball rolling to have millions of dollars in Washington?

The key is not to have the checks come from my office, the key is to have it come from other like minded areas. So in reality, I generally call another Lobbyist that represents the firm in question.

I would get $5,000 from AOL because they want to continue to throw that ?buy AOL now icon on your desktop)
I would get another $5,000 from Intel because they want to continue to sell processors
I would get another $5,000 from AMD because they want to continue to sell processors
I would get another $5,000 from Microsoft because they want to sell Vista
I would get another $5,000 from Norton, because they want to sell their anti-virus stuff
I would get another $5,000 from Valve, because they want to sell video games
I would get another $5,000 from CDW, because they want to sell more products
I would get another $5,000 from Google, because they want more people to visit their site
I would get another $5,000 from Ebay, because they want more people to buy stuff from their site
I would get another $5,000 from Yahoo, because they want more people to visit their site.
I would get another $5,000 from Redhat, because they want to sell more servers

The funny thing is I didn?t even get to the computer manufacturers yet?

I would get another $5,000 from Dell so their product isn?t taxed
I would get another $5,000 from HP so their product isn?t taxed
I would get another $5,000 from Apple so their product isn?t taxed
I would get another $5,000 from local firm ABZ so their product isn?t taxed
I would get another $5,000 from regional firm ACB so their product isn?t taxed

When all is said and done, my 8 hours of effort (1 business day) I could have anywhere between 5-10 million? all in $5,000 dollar donations from all the industries and firms that touch the PC.

Political Opinions : Woah, you thought of that list off the top of your head in 2 seconds?

AB SMITH: What do you think I do for a living?

Political Opinions: How did that relate to Ron Paul?

AB SMITH: With him, I could send millions to his pocket, and if he intended to vote against my wishes, that money wouldn?t matter? he would still vote against my wishes. He?s a big problem if he ever made it into office.. thank God it looks like he won?t? not because I don?t like the man as an American.. it?s just that he would make my job hard.

I knew you could make a post that was accurate once if you really tried.

Congrats.

In total blacks make up what about 12% of the public? What percentage I wonder of the voting public, given that somewhere around half of all eligible voters actually vote, black or white.

Now the southern red states are simply not going to vote for a black man, we know that, so that leaves the traditional democratic states. Here's the tough part, you don't think there's a lot of people that traditionally vote democrat and even though will tell you until they're blue in the face they're not racist will never ever vote for a black man? I think there's plenty.

You know who I'm talking about. The guy who has a black friend from work and will scream he's not racist but mentions to his wife one evening that he saw a black family move in down the street and maybe it's time they should get an alarm. You know, just in case.

and yet still one of the biggest contributors to his campaign are google employee's a firm who is campaigning for that very policy.

Obama has said time and time again that he has a 16 month plan. 16 months does not equal years.

And as far as his stance on nuclear weapons heres a direct quote.."There's been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That's not on the table."

So please shut the fuck up and stop spewing nonsense.

Thank you.

Google is a huge supporter of Net Neutrality. Even to go to the extent of hosting this page
http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality.html

furthermore you have no proof that google employees are some of his biggest contributors.

More Paultard nonsense.

"blanket statement that can't be proven, cliche cliche adjective noun Ron Paul cliche cliche" - Paultard argument

the thing is do you believe him? because I don't. he's been around 5 minutes and doesn't have much of a record, he's a typical establishment figure seemingly fast tracked to greatness at a tender age. makes me highly suspicious, he will sell you out as soon as he spouts enough lies to win the necessary votes

this is why Ron Paul has such a following, he can't be bought and he has a steller 30 year record

ya so lets all make up shit since we don't bother checking out the facts.

FEC records clearly show that google employee's are among his top contributors (check on opensecrets.org)

in addition, Paul participated in Candidates@GOOGLE and explained his position, that event got more attention than any other candidate, look it up on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCM_wQy4YVg)

one of those employee's Vijay, an american citizen, quit his lucrative post and went to NH to start operation live free or die:
http://operationlivefreeordie.com/

Specific Link? Or do you want me to dig until I can't find it and just have to believe you.

Luckily Ron Paul doesn't have a chance in hell. So all this arguing is pointless. Let's all have a coke and a smile.

this is for the third quarter

http://opensecrets.org/pres08/contri...906&cycle=2008

You still havent awnsered my question.

Instead of high jacking everyones threads with your Christian Coalition ignorance lets here what issues you stand on. What exactly in his past disproves what he speaks and stands for? Who are you supporting and why? You aint about shit.

Interesting analysis... thanks for sharing...

Id like to point you to a Zogby poll that say otherwise tho..
head to head:
Romney 35%
Obama 52%

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1393

I will leave this thread on this note

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm

The polls in the link above can not be gamed by internet nerds.

Have a Happy Holiday. I'll see you guys post Republican primary in the 9/11 conspiracy and Ron Paul conspiracy threads.

Racism is the most evident when you're casting your vote alone, not answering a poll.

I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying some of you don't have your hand as much on the American pulse as you thought.

Remember how shocked everyone was when Bush won AGAIN?

You are the one that high jacked this thread with your Ron Paul nonsense. Check the fucking posts You guys really are delusional.

Though I am undecided like MOST Americans....I know what I don't want...and I don't want Ron Paul.

Young = RWNED

When you end up with Huckabee, Giuliani or Romney, you might think differently.

Anyone want to take a guess at who is responsible for those quotes above?

People were shocked? Really?

If thats how you make your living why is it stupid? The only difference between us and say the oil industry is we dont have a powerful lobby.