View Single Post
Old 10-31-2012, 06:29 AM  
ilnjscb
Confirmed User
 
ilnjscb's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
That's not true.

I voted for Clinton and did not consider him in any way to be the lesser of two evils.
I will admit that my votes for Bush in 2000 and 2004 were choices between the lesser of two evils.
I voted for Obama and was completely sincere in my vote (fell for his bullshit about "hope and change" hook, link, and sinker)

I'm voting for Johnson this time. And I feel very "clean" about my vote.

So no, it's not "always".

But this year if you are voting for Obama or Romney then "yes" you are voting for the lesser of two evils.

And for the idiots in this post..."lesser of two evils" is just a saying. It doesn't actually mean "EVIL".
Clinton and Giuliani (for mayor) were the last of the two parties who I felt good about. Both centrists. It was so great to be young in the 90s in NYC. Then came the Great Idiot, who partisanized everything, and lied to everyone. How we in America ever voted in the son of a former president - No No NO! If someone comes from a "dynasty" they should usually be jailed, not made the president.

That goes for the kennedys as well. People who use rhetoric to lie and better their family fortunes by definition cannot be centrists because they must create hysteria to cover their activities.
ilnjscb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote