Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
I guess Obama's demographic is the only one that does not realize we still use bayonettes.
|
Dude, seriously, stop using that as a dodge of what happened to Romney on the question.
It's dumb since we have far less infantry troops all around and therefore even if every
infantry man had a bayonet it would still be
Millions short of WWII.
http://www.historyshots.com/usarmy/backstory.cfm
Quote:
During World War II about 16,000,000 personnel served in the U.S. Military.
Approximately 11,200,000 or 70% served in the U.S. Army
(4,200,000 served in the Navy and 660,000 in the Marines.)
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army
Quote:
During fiscal year 2010, the Regular Army reported a strength of 561,979 soldiers;
the Army National Guard (ARNG) reported 362,015 and the United States Army Reserve (USAR)
reported 205,281 putting the combined component strength total at 1,129,275 soldiers
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...each_servi ce
Why do republicans like you take an once of dumb and then defend it with a pound of fucking stupid?
